Scala 2.11.4 release. #242
Conversation
| --- | ||
| layout: news | ||
| post-type: announcement | ||
| title: "Scala 2.11.4 is now available!" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Should this be incorporated into make-release-notes tool in the future?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fixed and noted scala/make-release-notes#132
| * [Scala specification](http://www.scala-lang.org/files/archive/spec/2.11/) received a fair amount of love and became much more beatiful. It has got syntax highlighting ([#3984](https://github.com/scala/scala/pull/3984)), linkable headers, and a side bar with TOC ([#3996](https://github.com/scala/scala/pull/3996)). A few final touches has been merged that fix typos and mistakes stemming from automatic Latex to Markdown conversion we've done a while ago. Thanks attention for details [@gourlaysama](https://github.com/gourlaysama), [@som-snytt](https://github.com/som-snytt) and [roberthoedicke](https://github.com/roberthoedicke)! | ||
| * Non-deterministic pattern matching warnings has been fixed ([SI-7746](https://issues.scala-lang.org/browse/SI-7746)). Many thanks to [@gbasler](https://github.com/gbasler) for diving deep ([#3954](https://github.com/scala/scala/pull/3954])) into logical formulas constructed by our pattern matcher implementation! | ||
|
|
||
| Compared to 2.11.2, this release resolves [54 issues](https://issues.scala-lang.org/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20SI%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Fixed%20AND%20fixVersion%20in%20(%22Scala%202.11.3%22%2C%20%22Scala%202.11.4%22)%20ORDER%20BY%20component%20ASC%2C%20priority%20DESC). We reviewed and merged 120 [pull](https://github.com/scala/scala/pulls?q=is%3Apr+milestone%3A2.11.3) [requests](https://github.com/scala/scala/pulls?q=is%3Apr+milestone%3A2.11.4). |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
it will be hard for people to figure out that 'pull' and 'requests' are different links
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I haven't figured out better way to sneak in those two links. How about?
We reviewed and merged 120 pull requests (check this and this).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
yes, fine for me. i couldn't manage to get a query on github that combines the two..
|
in the PR for 2.11.2 (ba4e7ad#diff-1) we also changed |
|
oh, sorry, i just saw now that this change was not about the 2.11.2 release - but they seem to have a newer version of activator available (https://typesafe.com/platform/getstarted) |
|
Yep, however it's a bit confusing we mix it with Scala release PR. I'd like to take care of it in separate PR and keep this minimal. |
To be squashed.
|
the advantage of keeping it together is that you can compare diffs when doing the next release. but i agree having two commits would be good: one with all the generated / automatic changes, one with the manual stuff. |
|
I added a commit with all review feedback incorporated. Lukas, could you have a look again? |
|
I'm going to get something to eat. I'll be back online in an hour or so. |
|
it seems some of the fixes are still missing: https://github.com/scala/scala-lang/pull/242/files#r19621427 and https://github.com/scala/scala-lang/pull/242/files#r19621801 |
|
Fixed. I was editing the wrong file... |
|
I think I've addressed all concerns. Could you guys take another look? |
|
We still missed https://github.com/scala/scala-lang/pull/242/files#r19621688, LGTM otherwise |
|
I'll submit a new PR. |
|
Thanks! My repair appointment got rescheduled so I can announce around noon. — On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 9:27 AM, Adriaan Moors notifications@github.com
|
No description provided.