Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Document migration steps for changed rules for given prioritisation under 3.6 #20843

Open
WojciechMazur opened this issue Jun 27, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
area:documentation itype:meta Issues about process/similar

Comments

@WojciechMazur
Copy link
Contributor

Scala 3.5 introduces gradual changes to rules prioritization #19300 , these now (3.5) warn about selected implicit, and would start yielding errors in the future (3.6).
These changes lead to multiple warnings/errors in real-world projects like lichess-org/lila. We should identify the patterns in which warnings occur and provide a guide/migration steps on how to deal with them. Especially how to deal with changed resolved targets.

@WojciechMazur WojciechMazur added area:documentation stat:needs triage Every issue needs to have an "area" and "itype" label labels Jun 27, 2024
@Gedochao Gedochao added itype:meta Issues about process/similar and removed stat:needs triage Every issue needs to have an "area" and "itype" label labels Jun 27, 2024
@soronpo
Copy link
Contributor

soronpo commented Jun 27, 2024

The main issue with this change is that it's a problem that manifests down to the application level. We cannot simply just silence the warnings at the library level. Meaning that any library that experiences this, now needs its own migration guide for its users.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area:documentation itype:meta Issues about process/similar
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants