Skip to content

Avoid cyclic references due to experimental check when inlining #16195

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 31, 2022
Merged

Avoid cyclic references due to experimental check when inlining #16195

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 31, 2022

Conversation

odersky
Copy link
Contributor

@odersky odersky commented Oct 16, 2022

Fixes #16116

@odersky odersky requested a review from nicolasstucki October 16, 2022 12:38
@odersky odersky marked this pull request as ready for review October 30, 2022 17:44
@odersky odersky requested a review from dwijnand October 30, 2022 17:44
@odersky odersky assigned dwijnand and unassigned nicolasstucki Oct 30, 2022
@dwijnand dwijnand merged commit a8ee53c into scala:main Oct 31, 2022
@dwijnand dwijnand deleted the fix-16116 branch October 31, 2022 10:06
@Kordyjan Kordyjan added this to the 3.3.0 milestone Aug 1, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@dwijnand dwijnand dwijnand approved these changes

@nicolasstucki nicolasstucki Awaiting requested review from nicolasstucki

Assignees

@dwijnand dwijnand

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
3.3.0
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Incorrect. recursive value error on non-recursive value when transparent inline capability type should be inferred
4 participants
@odersky @dwijnand @nicolasstucki @Kordyjan