Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

sbt 1.9.7 (was 1.9.3) #19581

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 5, 2024
Merged

sbt 1.9.7 (was 1.9.3) #19581

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 5, 2024

Conversation

SethTisue
Copy link
Member

@SethTisue SethTisue commented Jan 31, 2024

modeled on #18322

I found that we cannot go to 1.9.8 right now, because the self-hosted part of our GitHub Actions setup runs afoul of sbt/sbt#7463, which will supposedly be fixed in sbt 1.10.0

compiler-interface going just to 1.9.6 is intentional — that's the most recent published version, as per https://github.com/sbt/zinc/releases/

(gonna let CI tell me if anything else is needed besides the simple version number bumping)

@SethTisue SethTisue self-assigned this Jan 31, 2024
@SethTisue SethTisue changed the title sbt 1.9.8 (was 1.9.3) sbt 1.9.7 (was 1.9.3) Jan 31, 2024
@SethTisue SethTisue marked this pull request as ready for review February 1, 2024 02:19
@SethTisue SethTisue requested a review from adpi2 February 1, 2024 02:19
Copy link
Member

@adpi2 adpi2 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@adpi2 adpi2 merged commit 6af5189 into scala:main Feb 5, 2024
19 checks passed
@SethTisue SethTisue deleted the sbt-1.9.8 branch February 5, 2024 17:11
@Kordyjan Kordyjan added this to the 3.4.1 milestone Feb 14, 2024
WojciechMazur added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 1, 2024
Backports #19581 to the LTS branch.

PR submitted by the release tooling.
[skip ci]
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants