Fix #545: no need to make members of static classes static. #546
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Otherwise we will need to rewrite references to `This` of class be references on ModuleVal. This is less efficient(instead of calling method statically known to be final, you have virtual call) and less jvm-friendly, as needs additional instructions to get to ModuleVal.
|
Otherwise LGTM |
DarkDimius
added a commit
to dotty-staging/dotty
that referenced
this pull request
May 13, 2015
DarkDimius
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 13, 2015
Fix #545: no need to make members of static classes static.
tgodzik
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 13, 2025
Backport "Add suppression if nowarn differs" to 3.3 LTS
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Otherwise we will need to rewrite references to
Thisof class bereferences on ModuleVal. This is less efficient(instead of calling method
statically known to be final, you have virtual call) and less jvm-friendly,
as needs additional instructions to get to ModuleVal.