Skip to content

Conversation

yiweichi
Copy link
Member

@yiweichi yiweichi commented Mar 11, 2025

Purpose or design rationale of this PR

Describe your change. Make sure to answer these three questions: What does this PR do? Why does it do it? How does it do it?

To prevent coordinator assign halo2 tasks to openvm prover, specially handle the corner case.

PR title

Your PR title must follow conventional commits (as we are doing squash merge for each PR), so it must start with one of the following types:

  • build: Changes that affect the build system or external dependencies (example scopes: yarn, eslint, typescript)
  • ci: Changes to our CI configuration files and scripts (example scopes: vercel, github, cypress)
  • docs: Documentation-only changes
  • feat: A new feature
  • fix: A bug fix
  • perf: A code change that improves performance
  • refactor: A code change that doesn't fix a bug, or add a feature, or improves performance
  • style: Changes that do not affect the meaning of the code (white-space, formatting, missing semi-colons, etc)
  • test: Adding missing tests or correcting existing tests

Deployment tag versioning

Has tag in common/version.go been updated or have you added bump-version label to this PR?

  • No, this PR doesn't involve a new deployment, git tag, docker image tag
  • Yes

Breaking change label

Does this PR have the breaking-change label?

  • No, this PR is not a breaking change
  • Yes

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes

    • Refined the login process to ensure only valid configurations are considered during authentication. This update enhances the reliability and consistency of login behavior for users.
  • New Features

    • Updated the software version from v4.4.93 to v4.4.94, reflecting the latest enhancements and improvements.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 11, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request modifies the NewLoginLogic function in the authentication logic. It changes the conditional check that determines whether to append the fork name from cfg.ProverManager.Verifier.LowVersionCircuit to the highHardForks slice, now checking against the HighVersionCircuit instead of the LowVersionCircuit. Additionally, the version tag in common/version/version.go is updated from "v4.4.93" to "v4.4.94". The subsequent mapping logic using the fork name remains unchanged. No public entities or external interfaces have been affected.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
coordinator/.../auth/login.go Modifies conditional check in NewLoginLogic to use HighVersionCircuit.ForkName instead of LowVersionCircuit.ForkName for appending to highHardForks; retains map initialization logic
common/version/version.go Updates version tag from "v4.4.93" to "v4.4.94"; no other changes to logic or declarations.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Client as LoginClient
    participant Logic as LoginLogic
    participant Config as Configuration

    Client->>Logic: Invoke NewLoginLogic()
    Logic->>Config: Retrieve HighVersionCircuit.ForkName
    alt ForkName ≠ "euclid"
        Logic->>Logic: Append ForkName to highHardForks
    else ForkName == "euclid"
        Logic->>Logic: Skip appending fork name
    end
    Logic->>Logic: Populate proverVersionHardForkMap
    Logic->>Client: Return initialized LoginLogic object
Loading

Suggested reviewers

  • georgehao
  • colinlyguo
  • yiweichi

Poem

Oh hop, hop, here’s a tweak in the code,
My whiskers twitch as logic's load,
A skip for "euclid", a new tale unfolds,
In the realm of forks, new rules are told.
With carrots and bytes in a joyful node!
🥕🐇

Warning

There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool’s configuration or disable the tool if it’s a critical failure.

🔧 golangci-lint (1.62.2)

level=warning msg="[runner] Can't run linter goanalysis_metalinter: buildir: failed to load package zstd: could not load export data: no export data for "github.com/scroll-tech/da-codec/encoding/zstd""
level=error msg="Running error: can't run linter goanalysis_metalinter\nbuildir: failed to load package zstd: could not load export data: no export data for "github.com/scroll-tech/da-codec/encoding/zstd""


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f77b8ae and 4f132cf.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • common/version/version.go (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • common/version/version.go

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@yiweichi yiweichi requested a review from omerfirmak March 11, 2025 05:16
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
coordinator/internal/logic/auth/login.go (2)

45-47: Consider adding a comment explaining the special case for "euclid"

This conditional check excludes "euclid" from the high hard forks list, which aligns with the PR objective to prevent halo2 tasks from being assigned to openvm provers. However, the reason for this exclusion isn't immediately clear from the code itself.

Adding a comment would improve maintainability and make the intent clearer for future developers. For example:

+ // Skip adding "euclid" to highHardForks to prevent assigning halo2 tasks to openvm provers
if cfg.ProverManager.Verifier.LowVersionCircuit.ForkName != "euclid" {
    highHardForks = append(highHardForks, cfg.ProverManager.Verifier.LowVersionCircuit.ForkName)
}

45-47: Consider making "euclid" a constant instead of a hardcoded string

Using a hardcoded string for "euclid" might cause maintenance issues if this value needs to change in the future. Consider defining a constant for this value at the package level:

+ // EuclidForkName represents the Euclid fork
+ const EuclidForkName = "euclid"

// Then in the conditional:
- if cfg.ProverManager.Verifier.LowVersionCircuit.ForkName != "euclid" {
+ if cfg.ProverManager.Verifier.LowVersionCircuit.ForkName != EuclidForkName {

This makes the code more maintainable and ensures consistency if this value is used elsewhere.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 69a7339 and 944de99.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • coordinator/internal/logic/auth/login.go (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
  • GitHub Check: tests
  • GitHub Check: tests
🔇 Additional comments (1)
coordinator/internal/logic/auth/login.go (1)

45-47: Verify test coverage for this conditional logic

This change introduces a conditional that alters the behavior of task assignments between provers. Ensure there are appropriate tests verifying that:

  1. The "euclid" fork name is correctly excluded from highHardForks
  2. Halo2 tasks are not assigned to openvm provers after this change

If tests don't exist, consider adding them to validate this important condition.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 42.15%. Comparing base (69a7339) to head (f77b8ae).

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #1616      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    42.10%   42.15%   +0.04%     
===========================================
  Files          222      222              
  Lines        17739    17741       +2     
===========================================
+ Hits          7469     7478       +9     
+ Misses        9560     9555       -5     
+ Partials       710      708       -2     
Flag Coverage Δ
coordinator 34.35% <100.00%> (+0.25%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

colinlyguo
colinlyguo previously approved these changes Mar 11, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@colinlyguo colinlyguo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm. pls bump the version before merging.

@yiweichi yiweichi changed the title fix(coordinator): assign halo2 tasks to openvm provers fix(coordinator): prevent assign halo2 tasks to openvm provers Mar 11, 2025
@yiweichi yiweichi requested a review from Thegaram March 11, 2025 05:42
@yiweichi yiweichi added the bump-version Bump the version tag for deployment label Mar 11, 2025
@omerfirmak omerfirmak merged commit 5f79735 into develop Mar 11, 2025
1 check passed
@omerfirmak omerfirmak deleted the fix-coordinator-task-assign branch March 11, 2025 07:00
omerfirmak pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 11, 2025
Co-authored-by: yiweichi <yiweichi@users.noreply.github.com>
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Mar 12, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bump-version Bump the version tag for deployment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants