Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(sequelize): add getDatabaseName method on sequelize instance #9937

merged 1 commit into from Sep 19, 2018

feat(sequelize): add getDatabaseName method on sequelize instance #9937

merged 1 commit into from Sep 19, 2018


Copy link

@madmoizo madmoizo commented Sep 19, 2018

Pull Request check-list

Please make sure to review and check all of these items:

  • Does npm run test or npm run test-DIALECT pass with this change (including linting)?
  • Does the description below contain a link to an existing issue (Closes #[issue]) or a description of the issue you are solving?
  • Have you added new tests to prevent regressions?
  • Is a documentation update included (if this change modifies existing APIs, or introduces new ones)?
  • Did you follow the commit message conventions explained in

Description of change


Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 19, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #9937 into master will increase coverage by <.01%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #9937      +/-   ##
+ Coverage   96.04%   96.04%   +<.01%     
  Files          63       63              
  Lines        9431     9432       +1     
+ Hits         9058     9059       +1     
  Misses        373      373
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
lib/sequelize.js 96.58% <100%> (+0.01%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update aa92764...3fefa47. Read the comment docs.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
None yet
None yet

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants