Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

New Check NameConventionForJunit4TestClassesCheck implemented. Fixes #80 #287

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 2, 2015
Merged

New Check NameConventionForJunit4TestClassesCheck implemented. Fixes #80 #287

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 2, 2015

Conversation

alex-zuy
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes issue #80

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same when pulling a4b3a29 on pirat9600q:NameConventionForJunit4TestClassesCheck_issue80 into f7f205d on sevntu-checkstyle:master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same when pulling 35cf841 on pirat9600q:NameConventionForJunit4TestClassesCheck_issue80 into f7f205d on sevntu-checkstyle:master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same when pulling 5a6c564 on pirat9600q:NameConventionForJunit4TestClassesCheck_issue80 into f7f205d on sevntu-checkstyle:master.

@alex-zuy alex-zuy force-pushed the NameConventionForJunit4TestClassesCheck_issue80 branch from 5a6c564 to d2c4c45 Compare January 2, 2015 15:44
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.02%) when pulling d2c4c45 on pirat9600q:NameConventionForJunit4TestClassesCheck_issue80 into 0f081de on sevntu-checkstyle:master.

@romani romani merged commit d2c4c45 into sevntu-checkstyle:master Jan 2, 2015
@alex-zuy alex-zuy deleted the NameConventionForJunit4TestClassesCheck_issue80 branch February 2, 2015 08:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@alex-zuy @coveralls @romani