librustc_middle: Rename upvars query to upvars_mentioned #2
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
arora-aman
requested review from
Azhng,
logmosier,
roxelo,
null-sleep,
jenniferwills and
ChrisPardy
|
For formatting the code according to rust community standards I ran Tests passed as well. |
ChrisPardy
approved these changes
May 24, 2020
arora-aman
force-pushed
the
upvars_mentioned
branch
from
9a1cc2f
to
e7668e9
Compare
As part of supporting RFC 2229, we will be capturing all the Places that were mentioned in the closure. This commit modifies the name of the upvars query to upvars_mentioned. Co-authored-by: Aman Arora <me@aman-arora.com> Co-authored-by: Chris Pardy <chrispardy36@gmail.com>
arora-aman
force-pushed
the
upvars_mentioned
branch
from
e7668e9
to
c3edb15
Compare
|
For future reference: rust-lang#72544 |
sexxi-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 30, 2020
fix comment add newline for tidy fmt error... edit suggestion message change the suggestion message to better handle cases with binding modes Apply suggestions from estebank code review Co-authored-by: Esteban Kuber <estebank@users.noreply.github.com> edits to address source review Apply suggestions from estebank code review #2 Co-authored-by: Esteban Kuber <estebank@users.noreply.github.com> update test files
sexxi-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 19, 2020
update from origin 2020-06-10
sexxi-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 1, 2020
Stabilize `#[track_caller]`. # Stabilization Report RFC: [2091] Tracking issue: rust-lang#47809 ## Summary From the [rustc-dev-guide chapter][dev-guide]: > Take this example program: ```rust fn main() { let foo: Option<()> = None; foo.unwrap(); // this should produce a useful panic message! } ``` > Prior to Rust 1.42, panics like this `unwrap()` printed a location in libcore: ``` $ rustc +1.41.0 example.rs; example.exe thread 'main' panicked at 'called `Option::unwrap()` on a `None` value',...core\macros\mod.rs:15:40 note: run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` environment variable to display a backtrace. ``` > As of 1.42, we get a much more helpful message: ``` $ rustc +1.42.0 example.rs; example.exe thread 'main' panicked at 'called `Option::unwrap()` on a `None` value', example.rs:3:5 note: run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` environment variable to display a backtrace ``` > These error messages are achieved through a combination of changes to `panic!` internals to make use of `core::panic::Location::caller` and a number of `#[track_caller]` annotations in the standard library which propagate caller information. The attribute adds an implicit caller location argument to the ABI of annotated functions, but does not affect the type or MIR of the function. We implement the feature entirely in codegen and in the const evaluator. ## Bottom Line This PR stabilizes the use of `#[track_caller]` everywhere, including traits and extern blocks. It also stabilizes `core::panic::Location::caller`, although the use of that function in a const context remains gated by `#![feature(const_caller_location)]`. The implementation for the feature already changed the output of panic messages for a number of std functions, as described in the [1.42 release announcement]. The attribute's use in `Index` and `IndexMut` traits is visible to users since 1.44. ## Tests All of the tests for this feature live under [src/test/ui/rfc-2091-track-caller][tests] in the repo. Noteworthy cases: * [use of attr in std] * validates user-facing benefit of the feature * [trait attribute inheritance] * covers subtle behavior designed during implementation and not RFC'd * [const/codegen equivalence] * this was the result of a suspected edge case and investigation * [diverging function support] * covers an unresolved question from the RFC * [fn pointers and shims] * covers important potential sources of unsoundness ## Documentation The rustc-dev-guide now has a chapter on [Implicit Caller Location][dev-guide]. I have an [open PR to the reference][attr-reference-pr] documenting the attribute. The intrinsic's [wrapper] includes some examples as well. ## Implementation History * 2019-10-02: [`#[track_caller]` feature gate (RFC 2091 1/N) rust-lang#65037](rust-lang#65037) * Picked up the patch that @ayosec had started on the feature gate. * 2019-10-13: [Add `Instance::resolve_for_fn_ptr` (RFC 2091 #2/N) rust-lang#65182](rust-lang#65182) * 2019-10-20: ~~[WIP Add MIR argument for #[track_caller] (RFC 2091 3/N) rust-lang#65258](rust-lang#65258 * Abandoned approach to send location as a MIR argument. * 2019-10-28: [`std::panic::Location` is a lang_item, add `core::intrinsics::caller_location` (RFC 2091 3/N) rust-lang#65664](rust-lang#65664) * 2019-12-07: [Implement #[track_caller] attribute. (RFC 2091 4/N) rust-lang#65881](rust-lang#65881) * 2020-01-04: [libstd uses `core::panic::Location` where possible. rust-lang#67137](rust-lang#67137) * 2020-01-08: [`Option::{expect,unwrap}` and `Result::{expect, expect_err, unwrap, unwrap_err}` have `#[track_caller]` rust-lang#67887](rust-lang#67887) * 2020-01-20: [Fix #[track_caller] and function pointers rust-lang#68302](rust-lang#68302) (fixed rust-lang#68178) * 2020-03-23: [#[track_caller] in traits rust-lang#69251](rust-lang#69251) * 2020-03-24: [#[track_caller] on core::ops::{Index, IndexMut}. rust-lang#70234](rust-lang#70234) * 2020-04-08 [Support `#[track_caller]` on functions in `extern "Rust" { ... }` rust-lang#70916](rust-lang#70916) ## Unresolveds ### From the RFC > Currently the RFC simply prohibit applying #[track_caller] to trait methods as a future-proofing > measure. **Resolved.** See the dev-guide documentation and the tests section above. > Diverging functions should be supported. **Resolved.** See the tests section above. > The closure foo::{{closure}} should inherit most attributes applied to the function foo, ... **Resolved.** This unknown was related to specifics of the implementation which were made irrelevant by the final implementation. ### Binary Size I [instrumented track_caller to use custom sections][measure-size] in a local build and discovered relatively minor binary size usage for the feature overall. I'm leaving the issue open to discuss whether we want to upstream custom section support. There's an [open issue to discuss mitigation strategies][mitigate-size]. Some decisions remain about the "right" strategies to reduce size without overly constraining the compiler implementation. I'd be excited to see someone carry that work forward but my opinion is that we shouldn't block stabilization on implementing compiler flags for redaction. ### Specialization There's an [open issue][specialization] on the semantics of the attribute in specialization chains. I'm inclined to move forward with stabilization without an exact resolution here given that specialization is itself unstable, but I also think it should be an easy question to resolve. ### Location only points to the start of a call span rust-lang#69977 was resolved by rust-lang#73182, and the next step should probably be to [extend `Location` with a notion of the end of a call](rust-lang#73554). ### Regression of std's panic messages rust-lang#70963 should be resolved by serializing span hygeine to crate metadata: rust-lang#68686. [2091]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/2091-inline-semantic.md [dev-guide]: https://rustc-dev-guide.rust-lang.org/codegen/implicit-caller-location.html [specialization]: rust-lang#70293 [measure-size]: rust-lang#70579 [mitigate-size]: rust-lang#70580 [attr-reference-pr]: rust-lang/reference#742 [wrapper]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/core/panic/struct.Location.html#method.caller [tests]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/tree/master/src/test/ui/rfc-2091-track-caller [const/codegen equivalence]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/rfc-2091-track-caller/caller-location-fnptr-rt-ctfe-equiv.rs [diverging function support]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/rfc-2091-track-caller/diverging-caller-location.rs [use of attr in std]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/rfc-2091-track-caller/std-panic-locations.rs [fn pointers and shims]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/rfc-2091-track-caller/tracked-fn-ptr-with-arg.rs [trait attribute inheritance]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/rfc-2091-track-caller/tracked-trait-impls.rs [1.42 release announcement]: https://blog.rust-lang.org/2020/03/12/Rust-1.42.html#useful-line-numbers-in-option-and-result-panic-messages
sexxi-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 5, 2020
This is a combination of 18 commits. Commit #2: Additional examples and some small improvements. Commit #3: fixed mir-opt non-mir extensions and spanview title elements Corrected a fairly recent assumption in runtest.rs that all MIR dump files end in .mir. (It was appending .mir to the graphviz .dot and spanview .html file names when generating blessed output files. That also left outdated files in the baseline alongside the files with the incorrect names, which I've now removed.) Updated spanview HTML title elements to match their content, replacing a hardcoded and incorrect name that was left in accidentally when originally submitted. Commit #4: added more test examples also improved Makefiles with support for non-zero exit status and to force validation of tests unless a specific test overrides it with a specific comment. Commit #5: Fixed rare issues after testing on real-world crate Commit #6: Addressed PR feedback, and removed temporary -Zexperimental-coverage -Zinstrument-coverage once again supports the latest capabilities of LLVM instrprof coverage instrumentation. Also fixed a bug in spanview. Commit #7: Fix closure handling, add tests for closures and inner items And cleaned up other tests for consistency, and to make it more clear where spans start/end by breaking up lines. Commit #8: renamed "typical" test results "expected" Now that the `llvm-cov show` tests are improved to normally expect matching actuals, and to allow individual tests to override that expectation. Commit #9: test coverage of inline generic struct function Commit #10: Addressed review feedback * Removed unnecessary Unreachable filter. * Replaced a match wildcard with remining variants. * Added more comments to help clarify the role of successors() in the CFG traversal Commit #11: refactoring based on feedback * refactored `fn coverage_spans()`. * changed the way I expand an empty coverage span to improve performance * fixed a typo that I had accidently left in, in visit.rs Commit #12: Optimized use of SourceMap and SourceFile Commit rust-lang#13: Fixed a regression, and synched with upstream Some generated test file names changed due to some new change upstream. Commit #14: Stripping out crate disambiguators from demangled names These can vary depending on the test platform. Commit #15: Ignore llvm-cov show diff on test with generics, expand IO error message Tests with generics produce llvm-cov show results with demangled names that can include an unstable "crate disambiguator" (hex value). The value changes when run in the Rust CI Windows environment. I added a sed filter to strip them out (in a prior commit), but sed also appears to fail in the same environment. Until I can figure out a workaround, I'm just going to ignore this specific test result. I added a FIXME to follow up later, but it's not that critical. I also saw an error with Windows GNU, but the IO error did not specify a path for the directory or file that triggered the error. I updated the error messages to provide more info for next, time but also noticed some other tests with similar steps did not fail. Looks spurious. Commit #16: Modify rust-demangler to strip disambiguators by default Commit #17: Remove std::process::exit from coverage tests Due to Issue rust-lang#77553, programs that call std::process::exit() do not generate coverage results on Windows MSVC. Commit #18: fix: test file paths exceeding Windows max path len
arora-aman
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 28, 2020
Fixes rust-lang#836 Benchmark #1: simple-raytracer/raytracer_cg_clif Time (mean ± σ): 9.250 s ± 0.056 s [User: 9.213 s, System: 0.015 s] Range (min … max): 9.151 s … 9.348 s 20 runs Benchmark #2: simple-raytracer/raytracer_cg_clif_cold_separated Time (mean ± σ): 9.179 s ± 0.101 s [User: 9.141 s, System: 0.016 s] Range (min … max): 9.070 s … 9.473 s 20 runs Summary 'simple-raytracer/raytracer_cg_clif_cold_separated' ran 1.01 ± 0.01 times faster than 'simple-raytracer/raytracer_cg_clif'
arora-aman
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 28, 2020
Benchmark #1: ./raytracer_cg_clif_pre Time (mean ± σ): 8.251 s ± 0.021 s [User: 8.245 s, System: 0.005 s] Range (min … max): 8.225 s … 8.292 s 10 runs Benchmark #2: ./raytracer_cg_clif_post Time (mean ± σ): 8.206 s ± 0.043 s [User: 8.199 s, System: 0.007 s] Range (min … max): 8.168 s … 8.279 s 10 runs
roxelo
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 30, 2020
``` Benchmark #1: ./raytracer_cg_clif_pre Time (mean ± σ): 9.553 s ± 0.129 s [User: 9.543 s, System: 0.008 s] Range (min … max): 9.438 s … 9.837 s 10 runs Benchmark #2: ./raytracer_cg_clif_post Time (mean ± σ): 9.463 s ± 0.055 s [User: 9.452 s, System: 0.008 s] Range (min … max): 9.387 s … 9.518 s 10 runs Summary './raytracer_cg_clif_post' ran 1.01 ± 0.01 times faster than './raytracer_cg_clif_pre' ```
roxelo
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 30, 2020
Don't run `resolve_vars_if_possible` in `normalize_erasing_regions` Neither `@eddyb` nor I could figure out what this was for. I changed it to `assert_eq!(normalized_value, infcx.resolve_vars_if_possible(&normalized_value));` and it passed the UI test suite. <details><summary> Outdated, I figured out the issue - `needs_infer()` needs to come _after_ erasing the lifetimes </summary> Strangely, if I change it to `assert!(!normalized_value.needs_infer())` it panics almost immediately: ``` query stack during panic: #0 [normalize_generic_arg_after_erasing_regions] normalizing `<str::IsWhitespace as str::pattern::Pattern>::Searcher` #1 [needs_drop_raw] computing whether `str::iter::Split<str::IsWhitespace>` needs drop #2 [mir_built] building MIR for `str::<impl str>::split_whitespace` #3 [unsafety_check_result] unsafety-checking `str::<impl str>::split_whitespace` #4 [mir_const] processing MIR for `str::<impl str>::split_whitespace` #5 [mir_promoted] processing `str::<impl str>::split_whitespace` #6 [mir_borrowck] borrow-checking `str::<impl str>::split_whitespace` #7 [analysis] running analysis passes on this crate end of query stack ``` I'm not entirely sure what's going on - maybe the two disagree? </details> For context, this came up while reviewing rust-lang#77467 (cc `@lcnr).` Possibly this needs a crater run? r? `@nikomatsakis` cc `@matthewjasper`
sexxi-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 13, 2021
HWAddressSanitizer support # Motivation Compared to regular ASan, HWASan has a [smaller overhead](https://source.android.com/devices/tech/debug/hwasan). The difference in practice is that HWASan'ed code is more usable, e.g. Android device compiled with HWASan can be used as a daily driver. # Example ``` fn main() { let xs = vec![0, 1, 2, 3]; let _y = unsafe { *xs.as_ptr().offset(4) }; } ``` ``` ==223==ERROR: HWAddressSanitizer: tag-mismatch on address 0xefdeffff0050 at pc 0xaaaad00b3468 READ of size 4 at 0xefdeffff0050 tags: e5/00 (ptr/mem) in thread T0 #0 0xaaaad00b3464 (/root/main+0x53464) #1 0xaaaad00b39b4 (/root/main+0x539b4) #2 0xaaaad00b3dd0 (/root/main+0x53dd0) #3 0xaaaad00b61dc (/root/main+0x561dc) #4 0xaaaad00c0574 (/root/main+0x60574) #5 0xaaaad00b6290 (/root/main+0x56290) #6 0xaaaad00b6170 (/root/main+0x56170) #7 0xaaaad00b3578 (/root/main+0x53578) #8 0xffff81345e70 (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x20e70) #9 0xaaaad0096310 (/root/main+0x36310) [0xefdeffff0040,0xefdeffff0060) is a small allocated heap chunk; size: 32 offset: 16 0xefdeffff0050 is located 0 bytes to the right of 16-byte region [0xefdeffff0040,0xefdeffff0050) allocated here: #0 0xaaaad009bcdc (/root/main+0x3bcdc) #1 0xaaaad00b1eb0 (/root/main+0x51eb0) #2 0xaaaad00b20d4 (/root/main+0x520d4) #3 0xaaaad00b2800 (/root/main+0x52800) #4 0xaaaad00b1cf4 (/root/main+0x51cf4) #5 0xaaaad00b33d4 (/root/main+0x533d4) #6 0xaaaad00b39b4 (/root/main+0x539b4) #7 0xaaaad00b61dc (/root/main+0x561dc) #8 0xaaaad00b3578 (/root/main+0x53578) #9 0xaaaad0096310 (/root/main+0x36310) Thread: T0 0xeffe00002000 stack: [0xffffc0590000,0xffffc0d90000) sz: 8388608 tls: [0xffff81521020,0xffff815217d0) Memory tags around the buggy address (one tag corresponds to 16 bytes): 0xfefcefffef80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0xfefcefffef90: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0xfefcefffefa0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0xfefcefffefb0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0xfefcefffefc0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0xfefcefffefd0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0xfefcefffefe0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0xfefcefffeff0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 =>0xfefceffff000: a2 a2 05 00 e5 [00] 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0xfefceffff010: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0xfefceffff020: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0xfefceffff030: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0xfefceffff040: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0xfefceffff050: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0xfefceffff060: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0xfefceffff070: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0xfefceffff080: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 Tags for short granules around the buggy address (one tag corresponds to 16 bytes): 0xfefcefffeff0: .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. =>0xfefceffff000: .. .. c5 .. .. [..] .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 0xfefceffff010: .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. See https://clang.llvm.org/docs/HardwareAssistedAddressSanitizerDesign.html#short-granules for a description of short granule tags Registers where the failure occurred (pc 0xaaaad00b3468): x0 e500efdeffff0050 x1 0000000000000004 x2 0000ffffc0d8f5a0 x3 0200efff00000000 x4 0000ffffc0d8f4c0 x5 000000000000004f x6 00000ffffc0d8f36 x7 0000efff00000000 x8 e500efdeffff0050 x9 0200efff00000000 x10 0000000000000000 x11 0200efff00000000 x12 0200effe000006b0 x13 0200effe000006b0 x14 0000000000000008 x15 00000000c00000cf x16 0000aaaad00a0afc x17 0000000000000003 x18 0000000000000001 x19 0000ffffc0d8f718 x20 ba00ffffc0d8f7a0 x21 0000aaaad00962e0 x22 0000000000000000 x23 0000000000000000 x24 0000000000000000 x25 0000000000000000 x26 0000000000000000 x27 0000000000000000 x28 0000000000000000 x29 0000ffffc0d8f650 x30 0000aaaad00b3468 ``` # Comments/Caveats * HWASan is only supported on arm64. * I'm not sure if I should add a feature gate or piggyback on the existing one for sanitizers. * HWASan requires `-C target-feature=+tagged-globals`. That flag should probably be set transparently to the user. Not sure how to go about that. # TODO * Need more tests. * Update documentation. * Fix symbolization. * Integrate with CI
sexxi-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 13, 2021
…fetime-error, r=estebank Fix suggestion to introduce explicit lifetime Addresses rust-lang#81650 Error message after fix: ``` error[E0311]: the parameter type `T` may not live long enough --> src/main.rs:25:11 | 24 | fn play_with<T: Animal + Send>(scope: &Scope, animal: T) { | -- help: consider adding an explicit lifetime bound...: `T: 'a +` 25 | scope.spawn(move |_| { | ^^^^^ | note: the parameter type `T` must be valid for the anonymous lifetime #2 defined on the function body at 24:1... --> src/main.rs:24:1 | 24 | fn play_with<T: Animal + Send>(scope: &Scope, animal: T) { | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ note: ...so that the type `[closure@src/main.rs:25:17: 27:6]` will meet its required lifetime bounds --> src/main.rs:25:11 | 25 | scope.spawn(move |_| { | ^^^^^ ```
sexxi-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 22, 2021
roxelo
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 9, 2021
Stop generating `alloca`s & `memcmp` for simple short array equality
Example:
```rust
pub fn demo(x: [u16; 6], y: [u16; 6]) -> bool { x == y }
```
Before:
```llvm
define zeroext i1 `@_ZN10playground4demo17h48537f7eac23948fE(i96` %0, i96 %1) unnamed_addr #0 {
start:
%y = alloca [6 x i16], align 8
%x = alloca [6 x i16], align 8
%.0..sroa_cast = bitcast [6 x i16]* %x to i96*
store i96 %0, i96* %.0..sroa_cast, align 8
%.0..sroa_cast3 = bitcast [6 x i16]* %y to i96*
store i96 %1, i96* %.0..sroa_cast3, align 8
%_11.i.i.i = bitcast [6 x i16]* %x to i8*
%_14.i.i.i = bitcast [6 x i16]* %y to i8*
%bcmp.i.i.i = call i32 `@bcmp(i8*` nonnull dereferenceable(12) %_11.i.i.i, i8* nonnull dereferenceable(12) %_14.i.i.i, i64 12) #2, !alias.scope !2
%2 = icmp eq i32 %bcmp.i.i.i, 0
ret i1 %2
}
```
```x86
playground::demo: # `@playground::demo`
sub rsp, 32
mov qword ptr [rsp], rdi
mov dword ptr [rsp + 8], esi
mov qword ptr [rsp + 16], rdx
mov dword ptr [rsp + 24], ecx
xor rdi, rdx
xor esi, ecx
or rsi, rdi
sete al
add rsp, 32
ret
```
After:
```llvm
define zeroext i1 `@_ZN4mini4demo17h7a8994aaa314c981E(i96` %0, i96 %1) unnamed_addr #0 {
start:
%2 = icmp eq i96 %0, %1
ret i1 %2
}
```
```x86
_ZN4mini4demo17h7a8994aaa314c981E:
xor rcx, r8
xor edx, r9d
or rdx, rcx
sete al
ret
```
arora-aman
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 25, 2021
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
As part of supporting RFC 2229, we will be capturing all the Places that
were mentioned in the closure.
This commit modifies the name of the upvars query to upvars_mentioned.