-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[FeatureRequest] Integrate appcast generation with GitHub Releases / Pages #648
Comments
It may be more practical to generate an appcast server-side based on changes to GitHub's release page. I don't really know how much info GitHub gives you in order to do that in a sane manner however. |
You could subscribe to the Atom page and update your Sparkle version once a new release comes out. Probably the safest way. |
Briefly looking at the atom feed, it's not meant to be used for this kind of task. Probably you'd want GitHub's Releases API. |
Well I meant doing it manually, no automation, since you would want to probably wait for a release to update in case there are bugs, especially if you're about to ship your software. |
Don't see the point of subscribing to the feed if you are the one pushing the release onto GitHub and have to generate the appcast manually. Anycase, I thought the original poster wanted it to be automated. One could try to make use of the "pre-release" field GitHub has, too. |
Really I would like to setup update suggestion for my app without any own backend. Don't wanna care of this dependency never. Just wanna add binaries to GitHub Releases page. |
That sounds like a very convenient thing indeed. I do have some concerns:
How about a slightly different thing: a tool that generates appcast.xml file from a GitHub's releases page? (and maybe even a local directory containing binaries) |
@pornel do you mean include |
While most information can be built automatically, the GitHub release page do lack some information essential for the appcast file, e.g. the version string (that positive incremental integer thing). Some extra metadata would still be needed. |
@k06a Yes, something like that. Committed to the repo, or perhaps to gh-pages? So it may be possible to do that with a tool that:
So that would be possible to do as a standalone tool outside of Sparkle, and the whole operation could be done with just one command. |
Maybe called like this:
Or |
I have a similar attempt recently. With some scripting and naming conventions. it is possible to encode the version number into the binary archive's filename. I had a script to perform archive and export the app zip file with names like With that, I can draft up and publish the releases and upload the binary just as usual in github web interface. Then there is the matter of setting up the gh-pages correctly to generate the I filter out all draft and pre-releases for my The biggest benefit of render the xml in Github is no extra interaction with the Github Release API is required; normal git access will suffice. Obviously this is strong convention and less flexible since the resolving logic relies on the filename, but it suits my objectives well. I can share my build script and liquid template for |
@huangyq23 will be perfect to share you result with community! 👍 |
@huangyq23 That's great! Thank you very much |
The CocoaPods app uses the same kind of technique as @huangyq23 mentioned, incase you want more examples. See the bottom of the Rakefile |
As a lazy person, I do not want to have to maintain |
If someone is interested in a lightweight solution that doesn't require a backend (i.e. only using github to host the releases and It is tested, and works. It delivers updates without the need for an extra web-server. |
What we still gotta do: - Make the update notes look better - Stop the generate_appcasts.py script from generating entries for so many old and unnecessary releases - Make updates and beta channel stuff behave properly (Channel setting isn't used when starting the app up) - Close more sheet when update commences - Share my script in that github discussion at sparkle-project/Sparkle#648 - Think about where to put the appcasts (we need to commit to that because it's hardcoded into the app)
See my solution here. It's a little verbose and slow, but it has these perks:
Thanks @lwouis for the inspiration! |
While I do appreciate all the workflows that have been contributed here, I think with regards to this issue still being open here, I'd prefer to leverage off generate_appcast which officially supports Sparkle's full feature set and numerous edge cases going forward (including delta updates, tracking which updates need to be kept, among other things). That might involve adding an option to select a specific version to upload a draft (pre)release to a Github Releases / Pages repository. |
For those who need this feature today, Conveyor is a tool that makes Sparkle-ized Mac apps (and Windows, and Linux packages) from cross-platform app frameworks like Electron/Flutter/JVM or indeed native apps. It can publish directly to GitHub Releases, also uploading a simple download page to GitHub Pages. And it can build/sign/notarize apps for all supported platforms from any platform, so you can run it in cheap GitHub CI workers or from your local dev laptop if you wish, you don't need a Mac to release Sparkleized Mac apps. It's commercial (disclosure: by my company), but it's free for open source apps and can be used today to release to GH Releases. |
@zorgiepoo is there any tool available that uses that yet? |
I'd also love to see this feature! |
My app binaries are hosted on GitHub Releases page.
I just wanna Sparkle to check this page for new versions :)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: