Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Behave like a terminal #20

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Oct 30, 2017
Merged

Behave like a terminal #20

merged 9 commits into from
Oct 30, 2017

Conversation

rchoffardet
Copy link

@rchoffardet rchoffardet commented Oct 29, 2017

This PR introduces a terminal-like behavior to the application as suggested in #18
Work is mostly done, but it introduces a breaking change : Shareable URL now needs to have a Hash before the command like so :
http://dnsrecords.io/#google.fr
If it matters, I have an idea to ensure backward compatibility :)

UI isn't one of my skills, so don't hesitate to give me advice/tips on how to improve it !

PS: Terminals have history so I included my previous work in #13

I also added the history -c command to clear history, I can change it to 'clear-history' or anything else.

@freekmurze
Copy link
Member

freekmurze commented Oct 29, 2017 via email

@rchoffardet
Copy link
Author

rchoffardet commented Oct 29, 2017

Will you accept a redirection (from dnsrecords.io/google.fr to dnsrecords.io/#google.fr) or do you need the exact same feature ?

@freekmurze
Copy link
Member

freekmurze commented Oct 29, 2017 via email

@rchoffardet
Copy link
Author

Done :)

@freekmurze freekmurze changed the base branch from master to feature-terminal October 30, 2017 17:57
@freekmurze freekmurze merged commit 71d1794 into spatie:feature-terminal Oct 30, 2017
@freekmurze
Copy link
Member

Thanks! Pulling it into a separate branch to play a bit with it.

@rchoffardet rchoffardet deleted the feature/behave-like-a-terminal branch October 30, 2017 18:55
@freekmurze
Copy link
Member

After having toyed around with it, we decided not to pull it in. Mainly because having results for multiple domains on the screen comes over as messy and might confuse users.

But thank you anyways for the work you put into this.

@rchoffardet
Copy link
Author

OK no problem.
You should reconsider reopening #13 (which was included in this one) then.

@freekmurze
Copy link
Member

For the sake of simplicity, we are going to leave things as they are now and not implement stuff around getting the previous command.

We might reconsider it in the future.

@rchoffardet
Copy link
Author

ok !

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants