Skip to content

feat: add C implementation for @stdlib/stats/base/dists/logistic/logpdf #4388

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Apr 1, 2025
Merged

feat: add C implementation for @stdlib/stats/base/dists/logistic/logpdf #4388

merged 4 commits into from
Apr 1, 2025

Conversation

DhruvArvindSingh
Copy link
Contributor

Resolves #3737 .

Description

What is the purpose of this pull request?

This pull request:

  • This PR adds C implementation for @stdlib/stats/base/dists/logistic/logpdf

Related Issues

Does this pull request have any related issues?

This pull request:

Questions

Any questions for reviewers of this pull request?

No.

Other

Any other information relevant to this pull request? This may include screenshots, references, and/or implementation notes.

No.

Checklist

Please ensure the following tasks are completed before submitting this pull request.

@stdlib-js/reviewers

@DhruvArvindSingh
feat: add c implementation for @stdlib/stats/base/dists/logistic/logpdf
322c0a4 
---
type: pre_commit_static_analysis_report
description: Results of running static analysis checks when committing changes.
report:
  - task: lint_filenames
    status: passed
  - task: lint_editorconfig
    status: passed
  - task: lint_markdown
    status: passed
  - task: lint_package_json
    status: passed
  - task: lint_repl_help
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_src
    status: passed
  - task: lint_javascript_cli
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_examples
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_tests
    status: passed
  - task: lint_javascript_benchmarks
    status: passed
  - task: lint_python
    status: na
  - task: lint_r
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_src
    status: passed
  - task: lint_c_examples
    status: passed
  - task: lint_c_benchmarks
    status: passed
  - task: lint_c_tests_fixtures
    status: na
  - task: lint_shell
    status: na
  - task: lint_typescript_declarations
    status: na
  - task: lint_typescript_tests
    status: na
  - task: lint_license_headers
    status: passed
---

---
type: pre_push_report
description: Results of running various checks prior to pushing changes.
report:
  - task: run_javascript_examples
    status: na
  - task: run_c_examples
    status: na
  - task: run_cpp_examples
    status: na
  - task: run_javascript_readme_examples
    status: na
  - task: run_c_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: run_cpp_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: run_fortran_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: run_javascript_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: run_julia_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: run_python_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: run_r_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: run_javascript_tests
    status: na
---
@stdlib-bot stdlib-bot added Statistics Issue or pull request related to statistical functionality. Needs Review A pull request which needs code review. labels Dec 30, 2024
@stdlib-bot
Copy link
Contributor

stdlib-bot commented Dec 30, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Coverage Report

Package Statements Branches Functions Lines
stats/base/dists/logistic/logpdf $\color{green}241/241$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$ 		$\color{green}27/27$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$ 		$\color{green}3/3$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$ 		$\color{green}241/241$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$

The above coverage report was generated for the changes in this PR.

@Planeshifter Planeshifter added the Potential Duplicate There might be another pull request resolving the same issue. label Mar 15, 2025
@Planeshifter
Copy link
Member

⚠️ Tracking Issue Closure Warning ⚠️

I noticed your PR description contains closing keywords ("Resolves", "Closes", or "Fixes") referencing a "Tracking Issue".

Why this matters:
Tracking issues should typically remain open until all related sub-issues are completed. GitHub automatically closes issues with such closing keywords when the PR is merged.

Required action:
Use "Progresses:" or "Ref:" instead to reference the tracking issue without automatically closing it.

Thank you for your contribution to the project!

@Planeshifter
Copy link
Member

/stdlib update-copyright-years

@stdlib-bot stdlib-bot added the bot: In Progress Pull request is currently awaiting automation. label Mar 31, 2025
@stdlib-bot stdlib-bot added Good First PR A pull request resolving a Good First Issue. and removed bot: In Progress Pull request is currently awaiting automation. labels Mar 31, 2025
@Planeshifter
Merge branch 'develop' into develop_#3737
c515dd7 
Signed-off-by: Philipp Burckhardt <pburckhardt@outlook.com>
@Planeshifter
chore: minor clean-up
7280a00 
---
type: pre_commit_static_analysis_report
description: Results of running static analysis checks when committing changes.
report:
  - task: lint_filenames
    status: passed
  - task: lint_editorconfig
    status: passed
  - task: lint_markdown
    status: passed
  - task: lint_package_json
    status: na
  - task: lint_repl_help
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_src
    status: passed
  - task: lint_javascript_cli
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_examples
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_tests
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_benchmarks
    status: passed
  - task: lint_python
    status: na
  - task: lint_r
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_src
    status: passed
  - task: lint_c_examples
    status: passed
  - task: lint_c_benchmarks
    status: passed
  - task: lint_c_tests_fixtures
    status: na
  - task: lint_shell
    status: na
  - task: lint_typescript_declarations
    status: na
  - task: lint_typescript_tests
    status: na
  - task: lint_license_headers
    status: passed
---
@Planeshifter Planeshifter changed the title feat: add c implementation for @stdlib/stats/base/dists/logistic/logpdf feat: add C implementation for @stdlib/stats/base/dists/logistic/logpdf Apr 1, 2025
Planeshifter
Planeshifter approved these changes Apr 1, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@Planeshifter Planeshifter left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, @DhruvArvindSingh!

@Planeshifter Planeshifter added the Ready To Merge A pull request which is ready to be merged. label Apr 1, 2025
@stdlib-bot stdlib-bot removed the Needs Review A pull request which needs code review. label Apr 1, 2025
@Planeshifter Planeshifter merged commit 0e04cae into stdlib-js:develop Apr 1, 2025
33 of 34 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@Planeshifter Planeshifter Planeshifter approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

Good First PR A pull request resolving a Good First Issue. Potential Duplicate There might be another pull request resolving the same issue. Ready To Merge A pull request which is ready to be merged. Statistics Issue or pull request related to statistical functionality.

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

3 participants

@DhruvArvindSingh @stdlib-bot @Planeshifter