Skip to content

docs: fix line wrapping #5389

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 23, 2025
Merged

docs: fix line wrapping #5389

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 23, 2025

Conversation

fadiothman22
Copy link
Contributor

@fadiothman22 fadiothman22 commented Feb 23, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Resolves Issue #5382.

Description

What is the purpose of this pull request?

This pull request:

  • Fixes line wrapping for the Bradford distribution CDF documentation, ensuring all lines wrap at 80 characters in repl.txt.

Related Issues

Does this pull request have any related issues?

This pull request:

Questions

Any questions for reviewers of this pull request?

No.

Other

Any other information relevant to this pull request? This may include screenshots, references, and/or implementation notes.

No.

Checklist

Please ensure the following tasks are completed before submitting this pull request.

@stdlib-js/reviewers

@fadiothman22
fix(docs): correct line wrapping for issue stdlib-js#5382
04f5a4f 
---
type: pre_commit_static_analysis_report
description: Results of running static analysis checks when committing changes.
report:
  - task: lint_filenames
    status: passed
  - task: lint_editorconfig
    status: passed
  - task: lint_markdown
    status: na
  - task: lint_package_json
    status: na
  - task: lint_repl_help
    status: passed
  - task: lint_javascript_src
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_cli
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_examples
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_tests
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: lint_python
    status: na
  - task: lint_r
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_src
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_examples
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_tests_fixtures
    status: na
  - task: lint_shell
    status: na
  - task: lint_typescript_declarations
    status: na
  - task: lint_typescript_tests
    status: na
  - task: lint_license_headers
    status: passed
---

---
type: pre_push_report
description: Results of running various checks prior to pushing changes.
report:
  - task: run_javascript_examples
    status: na
  - task: run_c_examples
    status: na
  - task: run_cpp_examples
    status: na
  - task: run_javascript_readme_examples
    status: na
  - task: run_c_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: run_cpp_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: run_fortran_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: run_javascript_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: run_julia_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: run_python_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: run_r_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: run_javascript_tests
    status: na
---
@stdlib-bot stdlib-bot added Statistics Issue or pull request related to statistical functionality. First-time Contributor A pull request from a contributor who has never previously committed to the project repository. Needs Review A pull request which needs code review. labels Feb 23, 2025
@stdlib-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Hello! Thank you for your contribution to stdlib.

We noticed that the contributing guidelines acknowledgment is missing from your pull request. Here's what you need to do:

  1. Please read our contributing guidelines.

  2. Update your pull request description to include this checked box:

    - [x] Read, understood, and followed the [contributing guidelines](https://github.com/stdlib-js/stdlib/blob/develop/CONTRIBUTING.md)

This acknowledgment confirms that you've read the guidelines, which include:

  • The developer's certificate of origin
  • Your agreement to license your contributions under the project's terms

We can't review or accept contributions without this acknowledgment.

Thank you for your understanding and cooperation. We look forward to reviewing your contribution!

stdlib-bot
stdlib-bot reviewed Feb 23, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@stdlib-bot stdlib-bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👋 Hi there! 👋

And thank you for opening your first pull request! We will review it shortly. 🏃 💨

@stdlib-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Coverage Report

Package Statements Branches Functions Lines
stats/base/dists/bradford/cdf $\color{green}229/229$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$ 		$\color{green}23/23$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$ 		$\color{green}3/3$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$ 		$\color{green}229/229$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$

The above coverage report was generated for the changes in this PR.

@kgryte kgryte added Documentation Improvements, additions, or changes to documentation. and removed Needs Review A pull request which needs code review. labels Feb 23, 2025
@kgryte
Copy link
Member

kgryte commented Feb 23, 2025

As the CI failure has been addressed, I'll go ahead and merge. Thank you for your first contribution @fadiothman22!

@kgryte kgryte changed the title docs: correct line wrapping for issue #5382 docs: fix line wrapping Feb 23, 2025
@kgryte kgryte merged commit 0622cf1 into stdlib-js:develop Feb 23, 2025
74 of 75 checks passed
saurabhraghuvanshii pushed a commit to saurabhraghuvanshii/stdlib-gs that referenced this pull request Feb 23, 2025
@fadiothman22 @saurabhraghuvanshii
docs: fix line wrapping
39e41af 
PR-URL: stdlib-js#5389
Closes: stdlib-js#5382
Reviewed-by: Athan Reines <kgryte@gmail.com>

---
type: pre_push_report
description: Results of running various checks prior to pushing changes.
report:
  - task: run_javascript_examples
    status: passed
  - task: run_c_examples
    status: passed
  - task: run_cpp_examples
    status: na
  - task: run_javascript_readme_examples
    status: passed
  - task: run_c_benchmarks
    status: passed
  - task: run_cpp_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: run_fortran_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: run_javascript_benchmarks
    status: passed
  - task: run_julia_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: run_python_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: run_r_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: run_javascript_tests
    status: failed
---
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@stdlib-bot stdlib-bot stdlib-bot left review comments

@kgryte kgryte kgryte approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Documentation Improvements, additions, or changes to documentation. First-time Contributor A pull request from a contributor who has never previously committed to the project repository. Statistics Issue or pull request related to statistical functionality.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@fadiothman22 @stdlib-bot @kgryte