Skip to content

build: add workflow to label applicable PRs as good first PRs #5470

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 27, 2025
Merged

build: add workflow to label applicable PRs as good first PRs #5470

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 27, 2025

Conversation

Planeshifter
Copy link
Member

Description

What is the purpose of this pull request?

This pull request:

  • labels PRs that reference issues with the label "Good First Issue" as "Good First PR"s.

Related Issues

Does this pull request have any related issues?

No.

This pull request:

Questions

Any questions for reviewers of this pull request?

No.

Other

Any other information relevant to this pull request? This may include screenshots, references, and/or implementation notes.

No.

Checklist

Please ensure the following tasks are completed before submitting this pull request.

@stdlib-js/reviewers

@stdlib-bot stdlib-bot added the Needs Review A pull request which needs code review. label Feb 27, 2025
@Planeshifter
build: add workflow to label PRs as good first PRs if applicable
006b150 
---
type: pre_commit_static_analysis_report
description: Results of running static analysis checks when committing changes.
report:
  - task: lint_filenames
    status: passed
  - task: lint_editorconfig
    status: passed
  - task: lint_markdown
    status: na
  - task: lint_package_json
    status: na
  - task: lint_repl_help
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_src
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_cli
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_examples
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_tests
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: lint_python
    status: na
  - task: lint_r
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_src
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_examples
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_tests_fixtures
    status: na
  - task: lint_shell
    status: missing_dependencies
  - task: lint_typescript_declarations
    status: na
  - task: lint_typescript_tests
    status: na
  - task: lint_license_headers
    status: passed
---

---
type: pre_push_report
description: Results of running various checks prior to pushing changes.
report:
  - task: run_javascript_examples
    status: na
  - task: run_c_examples
    status: na
  - task: run_cpp_examples
    status: na
  - task: run_javascript_readme_examples
    status: na
  - task: run_c_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: run_cpp_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: run_fortran_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: run_javascript_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: run_julia_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: run_python_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: run_r_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: run_javascript_tests
    status: passed
---

---
type: pre_push_report
description: Results of running various checks prior to pushing changes.
report:
  - task: run_javascript_examples
    status: na
  - task: run_c_examples
    status: na
  - task: run_cpp_examples
    status: na
  - task: run_javascript_readme_examples
    status: na
  - task: run_c_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: run_cpp_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: run_fortran_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: run_javascript_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: run_julia_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: run_python_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: run_r_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: run_javascript_tests
    status: na
---
@Planeshifter Planeshifter force-pushed the philipp/add-workflow-to-label-good-first-prs branch from 3bc5dbd to 006b150 Compare February 27, 2025 00:19
@Planeshifter Planeshifter requested a review from kgryte February 27, 2025 01:21
kgryte
kgryte reviewed Feb 27, 2025
View reviewed changes
kgryte
kgryte approved these changes Feb 27, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@kgryte kgryte left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@kgryte kgryte added CI Issue or pull request specific to continuous integration environments. Tools Issue or pull request related to project tooling. and removed Needs Review A pull request which needs code review. labels Feb 27, 2025
@kgryte kgryte changed the title build: add workflow to label PRs as good first PRs if applicable build: add workflow to label applicable PRs as good first PRs Feb 27, 2025
@kgryte kgryte merged commit dba2065 into develop Feb 27, 2025
39 checks passed
@kgryte kgryte deleted the philipp/add-workflow-to-label-good-first-prs branch February 27, 2025 02:12
@Planeshifter Planeshifter mentioned this pull request Feb 27, 2025
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@kgryte kgryte kgryte approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
CI Issue or pull request specific to continuous integration environments. Tools Issue or pull request related to project tooling.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[RFC]: add GitHub workflow which upon opening of a PR labels it as "Good First PR"
3 participants
@Planeshifter @kgryte @stdlib-bot