-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 45
feat: perform full processing in a worker #43
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
4039773 to
aaed694
Compare
| @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ | |||
| module.exports = { | |||
| 'plugins': ['@babel/plugin-transform-modules-commonjs'], | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
can you write a paragraph explaining why we need to add Babel to the ever-growing-list-of-compilers we need to support? Looks like it's only used by Jest?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
hang on I just realized this isn't studio-internal 😆 um... I'm still curious though
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's because of of lodash-es. I suspect I should be able to instrument TS to transpile those files, though, so will give it a try.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I see we replaced lodash - what is lodash-es doing for us?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Rollup does not really like CJS modules, so this is the primary reason.
Lodash-es is mostly used in a worker code, so it does not really change much now.
Co-Authored-By: William Hilton <wmhilton@gmail.com>
|
@P0lip I made a few fixes a very subtle off-by-one thingy.... the pre-rendered one didn't render the "half-row" at the bottom also don't use z-index it's evil and simple to avoid in this case by re-ordering the divs lol. 👍 oh and did you mean for it to have a |
|
of course I broke the tests |
|
blegh. could not figure out the tests. fine, keep the flickering half-row at the bottom. |
billiegoose
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Most impressive.
That's a feature? We want to have that cut to indicate the content can be scrolled |
|
🎉 This PR is included in version 2.7.0 🎉 The release is available on: Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀 |

Fixes #42
Closes #45