Feat/rate limiting

[fenos]

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

feature

What is the new behavior?

Implementing in memory/redis based rate limiting, to the render routes

environment variables added:

ENABLE_RATE_LIMITER=true

RATE_LIMITER_DRIVER=redis # or memory
RATE_LIMITER_REDIS_URL=6379

RATE_LIMITER_RENDER_PATH_MAX_REQ_SEC=4 #max number of requests per second before being limited 

to enable the limiter set to true the ENABLE_RATE_LIMITER env

[coveralls]

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 3642547321

Warning: This coverage report may be inaccurate.

This pull request's base commit is no longer the HEAD commit of its target branch. This means it includes changes from outside the original pull request, including, potentially, unrelated coverage changes.

• For more information on this, see Tracking coverage changes with pull request builds.
• To avoid this issue with future PRs, see these Recommended CI Configurations.
• For a quick fix, rebase this PR at GitHub. Your next report should be accurate.

Details

• 38 of 78 (48.72%) changed or added relevant lines in 8 files are covered.
• No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
• Overall coverage decreased (-0.5%) to 86.172%

---

Changes Missing Coverage	Covered Lines	Changed/Added Lines	%
src/monitoring/logger.ts	0	1	0.0%
src/http/routes/render/index.ts	4	6	66.67%
src/storage/renderer/renderer.ts	0	6	0.0%
src/http/routes/render/rate-limiter.ts	9	40	22.5%

Totals
Change from base Build 3637715512:	-0.5%
Covered Lines:	4893
Relevant Lines:	5658

---

💛 - Coveralls

[github-actions]

🎉 This PR is included in version 0.26.0 🎉

The release is available on GitHub release

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

[MarzyCoder]

@inian @fenos
Hi, I know this is very old. Nevertheless, I am very concerned about this issue. If I understand correctly, this change ensures that there is basic rate limiting for the Supabase storage. That's great!
But is there also a way to set custom rate limits in the supabase UI for specific buckets? That would be so great, as it would significantly improve the bandwidth-based billing. Would one of you be able to implement something like this, arrange it or give me a good tip?
I would be soo grateful for help!