[ExpressionLanguage] change evaluate() docblock return type from string to mixed
#27657
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
stof
approved these changes
Jun 20, 2018
Jeroeny
changed the title
evaluate() docblock return type from string to mixedevaluate() docblock return type from string to mixed
fabpot
approved these changes
Jun 20, 2018
fabpot
force-pushed
the
evaluate-docblock
branch
from
e40b7f7 to
2d26a55
Compare
|
Thank you @Jeroeny. |
fabpot
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 20, 2018
… type from string to mixed (jspee) This PR was submitted for the 4.1 branch but it was merged into the 2.8 branch instead (closes #27657). Discussion ---------- [ExpressionLanguage] change `evaluate()` docblock return type from string to mixed Issue: #27652 Commits ------- 2d26a55 change `evaluate()` docblock return type from string to mixed
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Issue: #27652