Skip to content

Conversation

moufmouf
Copy link
Member

Closes #80 and #88

Thanks @bolmstedt for reporting those!

@coveralls
Copy link

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 155

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 34.34%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 154: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 182
Relevant Lines: 530

💛 - Coveralls

2 similar comments
@coveralls
Copy link

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 155

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 34.34%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 154: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 182
Relevant Lines: 530

💛 - Coveralls

@coveralls
Copy link

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 155

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 34.34%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 154: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 182
Relevant Lines: 530

💛 - Coveralls

@moufmouf moufmouf merged commit a18b1fe into thecodingmachine:master Jan 30, 2019
@moufmouf moufmouf deleted the ignore_some_functions branch January 30, 2019 15:04
@TomasVotruba
Copy link

I got troubles with these too. Great 👍

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants