-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 91
estimate censoring probabilities #855
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Co-authored-by: Hannah Frick <hfrick@users.noreply.github.com>
I added more elements to the object, made a constructor, added classes, and made @hfrick Can you give these changes a look? Most of the changes are in 2126975 It's not completely future-proof but should give us a lot of latitude if we decide to extend this for informative censoring. Unit tests in tidymodels/extratests#67 will be merged after this is finalized. |
This pull request has been automatically locked. If you believe you have found a related problem, please file a new issue (with a reprex: https://reprex.tidyverse.org) and link to this issue. |
For censored regression models, fit a KM curve with the status field reversed.
These calculations may be used to measure model performance.
Unit tests will be in extratests.