Skip to content

Conversation

nicktrn
Copy link
Collaborator

@nicktrn nicktrn commented Sep 2, 2025

No description provided.

Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Sep 2, 2025

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 9b1ef7d

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 2, 2025

Walkthrough

  • Modified packages/core/src/v3/errors.ts.
  • In function shouldLookupRetrySettings, within the INTERNAL_ERROR branch’s switch on error.code, added a new case: "TASK_PROCESS_SIGTERM", which returns true.
  • No other control flow changes and no changes to function signatures or exported/public declarations.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch fix/retry-sigterm

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR/Issue comments)

Type @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore or @coderabbit ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Status, Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Status Page to check the current availability of CodeRabbit.
  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Caution

Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.

⚠️ Outside diff range comments (1)
packages/core/src/v3/errors.ts (1)

306-311: Fix incorrect TASK_HAS_N0_EXECUTION_SNAPSHOT spelling

Replace zero (0) with letter O in all occurrences to use the intended TASK_HAS_NO_EXECUTION_SNAPSHOT:

  • internal-packages/run-engine/src/engine/errors.ts (case at line 45)
  • packages/core/src/v3/schemas/common.ts (entry at line 181)
  • packages/core/src/v3/errors.ts (case at line 308)
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
packages/core/src/v3/errors.ts (1)

285-333: Optional: centralize error-code literals for safety and consistency.

Consider using TaskRunErrorCodes.* (or a shared const Set) instead of raw string literals in these switches to avoid typos and make cross-function alignment (shouldRetryError vs shouldLookupRetrySettings) harder to drift.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

💡 Knowledge Base configuration:

  • MCP integration is disabled by default for public repositories
  • Jira integration is disabled by default for public repositories
  • Linear integration is disabled by default for public repositories

You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9b1877b and 9b1ef7d.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • packages/core/src/v3/errors.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
**/*.{ts,tsx}

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (.github/copilot-instructions.md)

**/*.{ts,tsx}: Always prefer using isomorphic code like fetch, ReadableStream, etc. instead of Node.js specific code
For TypeScript, we usually use types over interfaces
Avoid enums
No default exports, use function declarations

Files:

  • packages/core/src/v3/errors.ts
{packages/core,apps/webapp}/**/*.{ts,tsx}

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (.github/copilot-instructions.md)

We use zod a lot in packages/core and in the webapp

Files:

  • packages/core/src/v3/errors.ts
🧠 Learnings (2)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: nicktrn
PR: triggerdotdev/trigger.dev#1418
File: packages/core/src/v3/errors.ts:364-371
Timestamp: 2024-10-18T15:41:52.352Z
Learning: In `packages/core/src/v3/errors.ts`, within the `taskRunErrorEnhancer` function, `error.message` is always defined, so it's safe to directly call `error.message.includes("SIGTERM")` without additional checks.
📚 Learning: 2024-10-18T15:41:52.352Z
Learnt from: nicktrn
PR: triggerdotdev/trigger.dev#1418
File: packages/core/src/v3/errors.ts:364-371
Timestamp: 2024-10-18T15:41:52.352Z
Learning: In `packages/core/src/v3/errors.ts`, within the `taskRunErrorEnhancer` function, `error.message` is always defined, so it's safe to directly call `error.message.includes("SIGTERM")` without additional checks.

Applied to files:

  • packages/core/src/v3/errors.ts
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (23)
  • GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (7, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (6, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (8, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (3, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (4, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (5, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (1, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (7, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (2, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (1, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (2, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (8, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (5, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (6, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (3, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (4, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / packages / 🧪 Unit Tests: Packages (1, 1)
  • GitHub Check: e2e / 🧪 CLI v3 tests (ubuntu-latest - npm)
  • GitHub Check: e2e / 🧪 CLI v3 tests (windows-latest - npm)
  • GitHub Check: e2e / 🧪 CLI v3 tests (windows-latest - pnpm)
  • GitHub Check: e2e / 🧪 CLI v3 tests (ubuntu-latest - pnpm)
  • GitHub Check: typecheck / typecheck
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript-typescript)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
packages/core/src/v3/errors.ts (1)

353-356: Approve – SIGTERM retry lookup aligned
shouldLookupRetrySettings now includes TASK_PROCESS_SIGTERM, matching shouldRetryError. Verified the sole call in run-engine/src/engine/retrying.ts and consistent mappings in core/src/v3/errors.ts and schemas.

@matt-aitken matt-aitken merged commit cf9398b into main Sep 2, 2025
31 checks passed
@matt-aitken matt-aitken deleted the fix/retry-sigterm branch September 2, 2025 14:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants