Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

fix: Vastly improve quality of tweet predicates (#121) #138

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from
Closed

fix: Vastly improve quality of tweet predicates (#121) #138

wants to merge 3 commits into from
+0 −4

Conversation

pizzaboxer
Copy link

No description provided.

@bluepilledgreat
Copy link

Let the de-elonmuskization begin!

biscuitehh
biscuitehh reviewed Mar 31, 2023
View reviewed changes
Copy link

@biscuitehh biscuitehh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@joseeight
Copy link

This is sadness.
🚢

@bluepilledgreat bluepilledgreat mentioned this pull request Mar 31, 2023
Closed
@regginator
Copy link

Fixes #121?

@josemaia josemaia mentioned this pull request Mar 31, 2023
Closed
karms
karms reviewed Mar 31, 2023
View reviewed changes
Copy link

@karms karms left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems good, go ahead with merge.

@rekdacted
Copy link

Breaking-Bad-overdose

@pizzaboxer pizzaboxer changed the title fix: Vastly improve quality of tweet predicates fix: Vastly improve quality of tweet predicates (#121) Mar 31, 2023
@callumisdumb
Copy link

+1 LGTM

@thebeanogamer
Copy link

LGTM

1 similar comment
@0xAda
Copy link

0xAda commented Mar 31, 2023

LGTM

@garbageman-phil
Copy link

:shipit:

@radifalco
Copy link

:shipit:

@PeasfulTown
Copy link

LGTM

@pizzaboxer
Copy link
Author

you guys did not just reopen issue/pr contributions lmao what

FsLJyWMakAA2ziZ

@regginator
Copy link

regginator commented Mar 31, 2023 •
edited

you guys did not just reopen issue/pr contributions lmao what

1984.mp4

@leondz
Copy link

leondz commented Mar 31, 2023

LGTM

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented Mar 31, 2023 •
edited

CLA assistant check
Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you all sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
1 out of 2 committers have signed the CLA.

✅ pizzaboxer
❌ twitter-team

twitter-team seems not to be a GitHub user. You need a GitHub account to be able to sign the CLA. If you have already a GitHub account, please add the email address used for this commit to your account.
You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.

This was referenced Mar 31, 2023
Closed
Closed
@DiegoFleitas
Copy link

LGTM

@SerajMuftah
Copy link

Based

pizzaboxer referenced this pull request Apr 1, 2023
Remove stats collection code measuring how often Tweets from specific…
ec83d01 
… user groups are served
@WaviestBalloon
Copy link

Censorship by Elon yet again........ Please fix this

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@biscuitehh biscuitehh biscuitehh left review comments

@karms karms karms left review comments

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet