We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
As of #108 , we added a bunch of new stuff to make our code testable on CRAN.
To make forward progress on the issues faced in that PR, we made a choice to use an approach that is Linux-specific (calling which -a R).
which -a R
Addressing this issue means replacing this: https://github.com/UptakeOpenSource/pkgnet/blob/master/R/testing_utils.R#L46 or wrapping it in some kind of if-else statement of the form
if (ON UNIX_ALIKE){ R_LOC <- system("which -a R", intern = TRUE) R_LOC <- R_LOC[!grepl("R_check_bin", R_LOC)][1] } else { other_stuff() }
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
more proof from devtools::build_win():
devtools::build_win()
https://win-builder.r-project.org/yHIi38dYz5RI/00check.log
Sorry, something went wrong.
Merge pull request #139 from jameslamb/bugfix/portable_tests
d1e974d
made testing strategy portable (fixes #121)
jameslamb
No branches or pull requests
As of #108 , we added a bunch of new stuff to make our code testable on CRAN.
To make forward progress on the issues faced in that PR, we made a choice to use an approach that is Linux-specific (calling
which -a R
).Addressing this issue means replacing this: https://github.com/UptakeOpenSource/pkgnet/blob/master/R/testing_utils.R#L46 or wrapping it in some kind of if-else statement of the form
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: