Skip to content

Conversation

viseshrp
Copy link
Owner

Pull Request

Fixes #

Proposed Changes

@viseshrp viseshrp merged commit bd2b031 into main May 24, 2025
8 checks passed
Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hello @viseshrp, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

Summary of Changes

Hello! Gemini (or gemini-code-assist) here, providing a summary of this pull request for author @viseshrp and reviewers.

This pull request, titled "Cruft", appears to primarily focus on updating the project to a newer version of the template it was generated from, likely using the cruft tool. This is indicated by the changes to the .cruft.json file, which tracks the template version by its commit hash. Additionally, a minor change has been made to the project's Makefile related to Git tagging.

Overall, the PR updates the template reference and modifies a build/release helper command.

Highlights

  • Template Update: The project's .cruft.json file has been updated to reference a newer commit (6f03acb04ca70ea6abbbdd8aca5caadd9e780834) of the viseshrp/yapc template. This suggests the project has been synced with recent changes in the template.
  • Git Tagging Modification: The tag target in the Makefile has been modified. The -s flag has been removed from the git tag command, which means future tags created using this target will no longer be GPG signed.

Changelog

  • .cruft.json
    • Updated the template commit hash from 10c7cc76029dfab48a5de100faefdb86fde02a90 to 6f03acb04ca70ea6abbbdd8aca5caadd9e780834 in both the root commit field and the _commit field within the context.cookiecutter section.
  • Makefile
    • Removed the -s flag from the git tag command on line 58 in the tag target, disabling GPG signing for tags created via this command.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.


A template commit,
A Makefile change, small bit,
Code evolves, you see.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request updates the .cruft.json file, likely reflecting an update from the project template, and modifies the Makefile to change how Git tags are created.

Summary of Findings

  • Update .cruft.json: The .cruft.json file was updated to a new commit hash. This likely reflects an update from the project template. (Note: This was a low severity finding and a review comment was not added per the review settings.)
  • Removal of signed Git tags: The Makefile was modified to remove the -s flag from the git tag command in the tag target. This means release tags will no longer be signed. Signed tags are important for verifying release integrity. This is a high severity issue that requires clarification or correction.

Merge Readiness

This pull request updates the project's template configuration and modifies the release tagging process. The change to remove signed Git tags is a high severity concern regarding release integrity and should be addressed before merging. I am unable to approve this pull request, and recommend that others review and approve this code after the high severity issue is resolved.

tag: ## 🏷 Tag the current release version (stripping .dev) and push
@echo "🏷 Creating signed Git tag: v$(VERSION)"
git tag -s v$(VERSION) -m "Release v$(VERSION)"
git tag v$(VERSION) -m "Release v$(VERSION)"

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

high

This change removes the -s flag from the git tag command. The -s flag is used to create a signed tag using the committer's GPG key. Removing it means the tags created by this target will no longer be cryptographically signed.

Signed tags provide a way to verify the integrity and origin of a release tag. Was the removal of signed tags intentional? If so, could you please explain the reasoning? If not, it's generally recommended to sign release tags for security and trust purposes.

	git tag -s v$(VERSION) -m "Release v$(VERSION)"

Copy link

codecov bot commented May 24, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 85.7%. Comparing base (45f161b) to head (d653b99).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@          Coverage Diff          @@
##            main    #146   +/-   ##
=====================================
  Coverage   85.7%   85.7%           
=====================================
  Files          8       8           
  Lines        294     294           
  Branches      39      39           
=====================================
  Hits         252     252           
  Misses        28      28           
  Partials      14      14           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant