-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Cruft #146
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hello @viseshrp, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
Summary of Changes
Hello! Gemini (or gemini-code-assist) here, providing a summary of this pull request for author @viseshrp and reviewers.
This pull request, titled "Cruft", appears to primarily focus on updating the project to a newer version of the template it was generated from, likely using the cruft
tool. This is indicated by the changes to the .cruft.json
file, which tracks the template version by its commit hash. Additionally, a minor change has been made to the project's Makefile
related to Git tagging.
Overall, the PR updates the template reference and modifies a build/release helper command.
Highlights
- Template Update: The project's
.cruft.json
file has been updated to reference a newer commit (6f03acb04ca70ea6abbbdd8aca5caadd9e780834
) of theviseshrp/yapc
template. This suggests the project has been synced with recent changes in the template. - Git Tagging Modification: The
tag
target in theMakefile
has been modified. The-s
flag has been removed from thegit tag
command, which means future tags created using this target will no longer be GPG signed.
Changelog
- .cruft.json
- Updated the template commit hash from
10c7cc76029dfab48a5de100faefdb86fde02a90
to6f03acb04ca70ea6abbbdd8aca5caadd9e780834
in both the rootcommit
field and the_commit
field within thecontext.cookiecutter
section.
- Updated the template commit hash from
- Makefile
- Removed the
-s
flag from thegit tag
command on line 58 in thetag
target, disabling GPG signing for tags created via this command.
- Removed the
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command>
or @gemini-code-assist <command>
. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
Feature | Command | Description |
---|---|---|
Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/
folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
A template commit,
A Makefile change, small bit,
Code evolves, you see.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request updates the .cruft.json
file, likely reflecting an update from the project template, and modifies the Makefile
to change how Git tags are created.
Summary of Findings
- Update
.cruft.json
: The.cruft.json
file was updated to a new commit hash. This likely reflects an update from the project template. (Note: This was a low severity finding and a review comment was not added per the review settings.) - Removal of signed Git tags: The
Makefile
was modified to remove the-s
flag from thegit tag
command in thetag
target. This means release tags will no longer be signed. Signed tags are important for verifying release integrity. This is a high severity issue that requires clarification or correction.
Merge Readiness
This pull request updates the project's template configuration and modifies the release tagging process. The change to remove signed Git tags is a high severity concern regarding release integrity and should be addressed before merging. I am unable to approve this pull request, and recommend that others review and approve this code after the high severity issue is resolved.
tag: ## 🏷 Tag the current release version (stripping .dev) and push | ||
@echo "🏷 Creating signed Git tag: v$(VERSION)" | ||
git tag -s v$(VERSION) -m "Release v$(VERSION)" | ||
git tag v$(VERSION) -m "Release v$(VERSION)" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This change removes the -s
flag from the git tag
command. The -s
flag is used to create a signed tag using the committer's GPG key. Removing it means the tags created by this target will no longer be cryptographically signed.
Signed tags provide a way to verify the integrity and origin of a release tag. Was the removal of signed tags intentional? If so, could you please explain the reasoning? If not, it's generally recommended to sign release tags for security and trust purposes.
git tag -s v$(VERSION) -m "Release v$(VERSION)"
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #146 +/- ##
=====================================
Coverage 85.7% 85.7%
=====================================
Files 8 8
Lines 294 294
Branches 39 39
=====================================
Hits 252 252
Misses 28 28
Partials 14 14 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
Pull Request
Fixes #
Proposed Changes