Skip to content

Conversation

ElizaWszola
Copy link
Contributor

@ElizaWszola ElizaWszola commented Sep 25, 2025

This PR resolves the issue (#25623) raised in #25607 by using a single padding-cutlass custom op on Hopper.

We are waiting to merge this after v0.11.0 release out of an abundance of caution.

Signed-off-by: ElizaWszola <ewszola@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: ElizaWszola <ewszola@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: ElizaWszola <ewszola@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: ElizaWszola <ewszola@redhat.com>
…ked op constructor

Signed-off-by: ElizaWszola <ewszola@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: ElizaWszola <ewszola@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: ElizaWszola <ewszola@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: ElizaWszola <ewszola@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: ElizaWszola <ewszola@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: ElizaWszola <ewszola@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: ElizaWszola <ewszola@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: ElizaWszola <ewszola@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: ElizaWszola <ewszola@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: ElizaWszola <ewszola@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: ElizaWszola <ewszola@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: ElizaWszola <ewszola@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: ElizaWszola <ewszola@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: ElizaWszola <ewszola@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: ElizaWszola <ewszola@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: ElizaWszola <ewszola@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: ElizaWszola <ewszola@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: ElizaWszola <ewszola@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: ElizaWszola <ewszola@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: ElizaWszola <ewszola@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: ElizaWszola <ewszola@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: ElizaWszola <ewszola@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: ElizaWszola <ewszola@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: ElizaWszola <ewszola@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: ElizaWszola <ewszola@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: ElizaWszola <ewszola@redhat.com>
@mergify mergify bot removed the needs-rebase label Sep 29, 2025
Copy link

mergify bot commented Sep 30, 2025

This pull request has merge conflicts that must be resolved before it can be
merged. Please rebase the PR, @ElizaWszola.

https://docs.github.com/en/pull-requests/collaborating-with-pull-requests/working-with-forks/syncing-a-fork

@mergify mergify bot added the needs-rebase label Sep 30, 2025
Signed-off-by: ElizaWszola <ewszola@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: ElizaWszola <ewszola@redhat.com>
@mergify mergify bot removed the needs-rebase label Sep 30, 2025
@ProExpertProg ProExpertProg enabled auto-merge (squash) September 30, 2025 11:41
@github-actions github-actions bot added the ready ONLY add when PR is ready to merge/full CI is needed label Sep 30, 2025
Signed-off-by: ElizaWszola <ewszola@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: ElizaWszola <ewszola@redhat.com>
auto-merge was automatically disabled September 30, 2025 19:28

Head branch was pushed to by a user without write access

@ProExpertProg ProExpertProg removed the ready ONLY add when PR is ready to merge/full CI is needed label Sep 30, 2025
Signed-off-by: ElizaWszola <ewszola@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: ElizaWszola <ewszola@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: ElizaWszola <ewszola@redhat.com>
Copy link
Collaborator

@ProExpertProg ProExpertProg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just two logic simplification comments, otherwise LGTM!

Signed-off-by: ElizaWszola <ewszola@redhat.com>
@ProExpertProg ProExpertProg enabled auto-merge (squash) October 1, 2025 14:40
@github-actions github-actions bot added the ready ONLY add when PR is ready to merge/full CI is needed label Oct 1, 2025
Signed-off-by: ElizaWszola <ewszola@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: ElizaWszola <ewszola@redhat.com>
@ProExpertProg ProExpertProg merged commit 502640c into vllm-project:main Oct 2, 2025
54 checks passed
pdasigi pushed a commit to pdasigi/vllm that referenced this pull request Oct 2, 2025
…m-project#25696)

Signed-off-by: ElizaWszola <ewszola@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: ElizaWszola <elizaw.9289@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Luka Govedič <lgovedic@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Luka Govedič <ProExpertProg@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Luka Govedič <ProExpertProg@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Michael Goin <mgoin64@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Luka Govedič <lgovedic@redhat.com>
@ProExpertProg
Copy link
Collaborator

@ElizaWszola now that cutlass 4.2 has landed, can you remove the hopper padding in a follow-up?

yewentao256 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 3, 2025
)

Signed-off-by: ElizaWszola <ewszola@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: ElizaWszola <elizaw.9289@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Luka Govedič <lgovedic@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Luka Govedič <ProExpertProg@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Luka Govedič <ProExpertProg@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Michael Goin <mgoin64@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Luka Govedič <lgovedic@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: yewentao256 <zhyanwentao@126.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
performance Performance-related issues ready ONLY add when PR is ready to merge/full CI is needed
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants