Skip to content

Conversation

@andrea-perego
Copy link
Contributor

See #1392 (comment)

This PR tries to address the ambiguity of the term "resource" in the definitions of properties locn:geometry, dcat:bbox, and dcat:centroid by replacing it with "spatial thing", in the SDW-BP sense - see https://www.w3.org/TR/sdw-bp/#spatial-things-features-and-geometry

Relevant issue: #1392

Replace "resource" with "spatial thing" (in the SDW-BP sense) in the definition of `locn:geometry`, `dcat:bbox`, and `dcat:centroid`.
@andrea-perego andrea-perego added dcat Editorial feedback Issues stemming from external feedback to the WG locn:geometry labels Nov 9, 2021
@andrea-perego andrea-perego added this to the DCAT3 3PWD milestone Nov 9, 2021
@andrea-perego andrea-perego marked this pull request as ready for review November 9, 2021 22:38
@andrea-perego
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks for endorsing this proposal, @riccardoAlbertoni .

Once we agree on the revision to be made, we need to update the RDF vocabulary accordingly before merging this PR.

Copy link
Contributor

@davebrowning davebrowning left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Noting that the RDF needs to be updated to bring it into line, but the changes look like the right step.

@andrea-perego
Copy link
Contributor Author

Noting that the RDF needs to be updated to bring it into line, but the changes look like the right step.

Thanks, @davebrowning . I just revised the English definitions in dcat3.ttl and dcat-external.ttl. We need to generate the other serialisations before merging.

@riccardoAlbertoni
Copy link
Contributor

The other serializations have been generated.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

dcat Editorial feedback Issues stemming from external feedback to the WG locn:geometry

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Semantics of the dcat:bbox attribute could (should?) be more explicit

5 participants