Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Accessibility Considerations text is confusing or incorrect #32

Closed
pes10k opened this issue Aug 9, 2022 · 3 comments
Closed

Accessibility Considerations text is confusing or incorrect #32

pes10k opened this issue Aug 9, 2022 · 3 comments
Labels
privacy-tracker Group bringing to attention of Privacy, or tracked by the Privacy Group but not needing response.

Comments

@pes10k
Copy link

pes10k commented Aug 9, 2022

This issue is being filed as part of of PING's horizontal review

The current accessibility considerations section says (in total)

As MiniApp Lifecycle is not user aware and does not involve user interaction, accessibility consideration is not needed in this specification.

This seems incorrect or misleading since many of these events will happen because of user interaction, no? (the app being launched, a page being shown, closed and / or switched with another, etc)

This is not a blocking privacy issue, but im mentioning it since it came up during the review

@pes10k pes10k added the privacy-tracker Group bringing to attention of Privacy, or tracked by the Privacy Group but not needing response. label Aug 9, 2022
@QingAn
Copy link
Contributor

QingAn commented Aug 23, 2022

This seems incorrect or misleading since many of these events will happen because of user interaction, no? (the app being launched, a page being shown, closed and / or switched with another, etc)

@pes10k In this case, yes, MiniApp Lifecycle change is triggered by user interaction. MiniApp Lifecycle spec defines GlobalState and PageState to indicate whether the MiniApp is shown or hidden, which can be used to accommodate assistive technologies.

Does it address this issue by adding some text description like the above in the Accessibility Considerations section?

@pes10k
Copy link
Author

pes10k commented Aug 24, 2022

Yep, just clarifying that the proposal does involve (sometimes) responding to user interactions would be sufficient here. Thanks!

@QingAn
Copy link
Contributor

QingAn commented Sep 27, 2022

resolved

@QingAn QingAn closed this as completed Sep 27, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
privacy-tracker Group bringing to attention of Privacy, or tracked by the Privacy Group but not needing response.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants