Update example1.ttl to match example 7 in RDF 1.2 XML Syntax

[jaw111]

---

Preview | Diff

[gkellogg]

The example either needs other updates to be consistent with the current RDF/XML state (e.g., <https://www.w3.ort/TR/rdf12-xml> and editors), or it stay they way it was historically.

[w3cbot]

gkellogg marked as non substantive for IPR from ash-nazg.

[jaw111]

OK, so example 7 in RDF 1.2 XML Syntax should become:

<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
            xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
            xmlns:ex="http://example.org/stuff/1.0/">
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://www.w3.org/TR/rdf12-xml"
             dc:title="RDF 1.2 XML Syntax">
    <ex:editor>
      <rdf:Description ex:fullName="Gregg Kellogg">
        <ex:homePage rdf:resource="https://greggkellogg.net/" />
      </rdf:Description>
    </ex:editor>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Also adjust the other examples accordingly.

Is that correct?

[gkellogg]

That update matches this version, so yes (although I hate to take the credit from Dave).

[jaw111]

@gkellogg one doubt on the IRI for the recommendation, should that be <https://www.w3.org/TR/rdf12-xml> (no trailing slash) or <https://www.w3.org/TR/rdf12-xml/> (with trailing slash)?

I note the JSON-LD embedded in the HTML has the trailing slash.

[gkellogg]

The "Latest published version" uses a trailing "/", so that's probably appropriate.

[domel]

@jaw111 it is moved to #115