Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

(editorial) change "Linked Data" to "LD" #77

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: gh-pages
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

TallTed
Copy link
Member

@TallTed TallTed commented Jul 3, 2019

"Linked Data Proofs" and "Linked Data Signatures" are referred to as "LD-Proofs" and "LD-Signatures" in the Data Model spec

"Linked Data Proofs" and "Linked Data Signatures" are referred to as "LD-Proofs" and "LD-Signatures" in the Data Model spec
@dmitrizagidulin
Copy link
Collaborator

@TallTed Hehe, though you are right to point out that "LD" matches the spec more, we're kind of stuck with the full "Linked Data" for the moment, especially in that generate.js file, since the only unique identifiers for the test results are their full titles, which include "Linked Data".

@dmitrizagidulin
Copy link
Collaborator

Basically, if we change the section names, it's going to throw off test result reporting (until all implementations re-run and re-submit their suites).

@TallTed
Copy link
Member Author

TallTed commented Jul 3, 2019

@dmitrizagidulin - Is it possible to quickly sed or similar over all relevant files? This mis-match seems likely to be problematic over time, when people are looking in the implementation report for implementations which reported support for feature X in the spec.

@dmitrizagidulin
Copy link
Collaborator

Ah, hmm, that's a good point. Do you mind doing that?

@dmitrizagidulin
Copy link
Collaborator

(Though first let me pull in the pending test report PRs)

@TallTed
Copy link
Member Author

TallTed commented Jul 3, 2019

@dmitrizagidulin - I can roll through all the files in the w3c/vc-test-suite repo, but my primary (all-but-exclusive) github interface is my web browser, so it will take some time and manual effort. Anyone who works through command-line git will be better equipped to do this.

@dmitrizagidulin
Copy link
Collaborator

No worries, I'll do it, then.

@TallTed
Copy link
Member Author

TallTed commented Nov 9, 2021

I think that resolves things in the correct way... but some other eyes would be good.

@lamjay2704
Copy link

Thanks

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants