Skip to content

Reintroduce the dependency on a parent's security. #55

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 1, 2018
Merged

Conversation

mikewest
Copy link
Member

@mikewest mikewest commented Jan 19, 2018

The patch in 98f2c26 inadvertantly removed the check which ensured that nested
browsing contexts would be treated as non-secure in cases where an ancestor was
non-secure. This patch reintroduces that check by requiring 'contextual security'
for any parent browsing context's active document.

Closes #54. Thanks to @bzbarsky for noticing the removal.


Preview | Diff

The patch in 98f2c26 inadvertantly removed the check which ensured that nested
browsing contexts would be treated as non-secure in cases where an ancestor was
non-secure. This patch reintroduces that check by requiring 'contextual security'
for any parent browsing context's active document.

Closes #54. Thanks to @bzbarsky for noticing the removal.
@mikewest
Copy link
Member Author

WDYT, @bzbarsky/@annevk?

@estark37
Copy link

LGTM!

@annevk
Copy link
Member

annevk commented Mar 1, 2018

This looks good. I did find #56 while looking at the overall algorithm again though. (Might not be a problem per se in implementations. Not sure if anyone supports nested workers yet.)

@annevk
Copy link
Member

annevk commented Mar 1, 2018

Also found #57.

@bzbarsky
Copy link

bzbarsky commented Mar 1, 2018

Gecko supports nested workers. I'll follow up in #56 on what we implement.

@mikewest mikewest merged commit 322bd8f into master Mar 1, 2018
@mikewest mikewest deleted the parents branch March 1, 2018 19:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants