Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

x:node-type() for XQuery #489

Merged
merged 1,073 commits into from
Jun 11, 2019
Merged

x:node-type() for XQuery #489

merged 1,073 commits into from
Jun 11, 2019

Conversation

AirQuick
Copy link
Member

This pull request derives from #488. So needs to be handled after that.


This pull request provides x:node-type() to XQuery.

  • d3c9005 implements the function
  • ab854ae moves the corresponding test scenarios from xspec-utils_stylesheet.xspec to xspec-utils.xspec. Now they are tested both on XSLT and XQuery.

This pull request prepares to make XQuery more compatible with XSLT.

…alid-xsl

# Conflicts:
#	bin/xspec.bat
#	test/win-bats/collection.xml
#	test/xspec.bats
# Conflicts:
#	bin/xspec.bat
#	test/win-bats/collection.xml
#	test/xspec.bats
…-cmdline

# Conflicts:
#	bin/xspec.bat
#	test/win-bats/collection.xml
#	test/xspec.bats
…-ant

# Conflicts:
#	bin/xspec.bat
#	test/win-bats/collection.xml
#	test/xspec.bats
# Conflicts:
#	test/win-bats/collection.xml
#	test/xspec.bats
# Conflicts:
#	test/end-to-end/cases/expected/stylesheet/xspec-rule-result.html
#	test/end-to-end/cases/expected/xspec-rule-junit-norm.xml
#	test/end-to-end/cases/xspec-rule.xspec
#	test/win-bats/collection.xml
#	test/xspec-node-selection.xspec
#	test/xspec.bats
…e-type

# Conflicts:
#	test/xspec-result-naming-collision.xspec
@AirQuick AirQuick added this to the v1.4.0 milestone Apr 30, 2019
…e-type

# Conflicts:
#	src/common/xspec-utils.xquery
#	test/xspec-utils.xspec
#	test/xspec-utils_stylesheet.xspec
@AirQuick AirQuick merged commit 2cebf04 into xspec:master Jun 11, 2019
@AirQuick AirQuick deleted the xquery-node-type branch June 11, 2019 10:08
@AirQuick
Copy link
Member Author

@cirulls
Merged this internal enhancement.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant