Skip to content

Conversation

john-tornblom
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@coveralls
Copy link
Collaborator

coveralls commented Feb 21, 2022

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 80.039% when pulling 6902ee4 on bug-report-template into d94f79a on master.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 21, 2022

Unit Test Results

    4 files  ±0      4 suites  ±0   1m 29s ⏱️ +14s
238 tests ±0  238 ✔️ ±0  0 💤 ±0  0 ±0 
952 runs  ±0  952 ✔️ ±0  0 💤 ±0  0 ±0 

Results for commit 6902ee4. ± Comparison against base commit d94f79a.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@john-tornblom
Copy link
Contributor Author

This PR serves to improve bug reports submitted to pyxtuml. Does it need to include more information, or is it to much?

@john-tornblom john-tornblom merged commit 19963f4 into master Feb 22, 2022
@john-tornblom
Copy link
Contributor Author

FYI, users submitting bug reports will now be presented with the following template.

Describe the bug
A clear and concise description of what the bug is.

To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:

  1. Obtain input model from '...'
  2. Launch pyxtuml with the command line '...'
  3. Observe the reported error meesage

Expected behavior
A clear and concise description of what you expected to happen.

Environment (please complete the following information):

  • OS: [e.g. iOS]
  • Metamodel version (or Bridgepoint version used)
  • Python version [e.g. 3.7]
  • pyxtuml version [e.g. 2.3.0]

Additional context
Add any other context about the problem here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants