Skip to content

Conversation

terabytesoftw
Copy link
Member

@terabytesoftw terabytesoftw commented Jun 29, 2025

Q A
Is bugfix? ✔️
New feature?
Breaks BC?

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Improved handling of node depth and tree attributes to prevent unintended updates when values are null.
    • Attribute updates and shifts are now applied only when valid values are present, ensuring more reliable node insertion behavior.
  • Tests
    • Added tests to verify node attribute settings when internal references are null.
    • Validated tree structure integrity after appending child nodes.

…ute` method of `NestedSetsBehavior` class.
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 29, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (79edce5) to head (f253e65).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##                main       #21   +/-   ##
===========================================
  Coverage     100.00%   100.00%           
- Complexity        88        89    +1     
===========================================
  Files              2         2           
  Lines            465       465           
===========================================
  Hits             465       465           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 29, 2025

Walkthrough

The beforeInsertNode method in NestedSetsBehavior.php was updated to perform stricter null checks when setting the depth and tree attributes of nodes. Attribute updates and the call to shiftLeftRightAttribute are now conditionally executed only when relevant values are not null, refining the insertion logic. Additionally, two new tests were added to verify behavior when the internal node reference is null and to validate tree structure integrity after appending a child node.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
src/NestedSetsBehavior.php Refined null checks and conditional logic for setting depth/tree attributes and calling attribute shift.
tests/NestedSetsBehaviorTest.php Added two tests covering null internal node handling and appending child nodes to root nodes.
.styleci.yml Disabled new_with_parentheses style check rule.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Caller
    participant NestedSetsBehavior
    participant OwnerNode
    participant TargetNode

    Caller->>NestedSetsBehavior: beforeInsertNode(owner, target, value, depthOffset)
    alt target's depth is not null
        NestedSetsBehavior->>OwnerNode: Set depth attribute to target.depth + depthOffset
    end
    alt treeAttribute enabled and target is not null
        NestedSetsBehavior->>OwnerNode: Set tree attribute from target
    end
    alt value is not null
        NestedSetsBehavior->>NestedSetsBehavior: shiftLeftRightAttribute(value)
    end
Loading

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

bug

Poem

In the garden of nested sets,
Rabbits hop with careful bets.
Only when the values show,
Do they let the attributes grow.
No more guessing, nulls in check—
The tree stands tall, no broken neck!
🐇🌳


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7300bd4 and f253e65.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .styleci.yml (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • .styleci.yml
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
  • GitHub Check: phpunit-compatibility / PHP 8.2-windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit-compatibility / PHP 8.3-windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit-compatibility / PHP 8.4-windows-latest

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@terabytesoftw terabytesoftw requested a review from Copilot June 29, 2025 16:14
Copy link

@Copilot Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR refactors the handling of the depth attribute in the shiftLeftRightAttribute method of the NestedSetsBehavior class to avoid unintended updates when attribute values are null.

  • Updated depth attribute logic to update only when a valid depth value is present.
  • Modified tree attribute assignment to occur only if a node is available.
  • Adjusted the left-right shifting to execute only when a non-null value is provided.
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (3)

src/NestedSetsBehavior.php:1057

  • [nitpick] Consider adding a comment to explain why the depth attribute update is skipped when the node's depth value is null, highlighting the intention behind removing the default fallback of 0.
        $nodeDepthValue = $this->node?->getAttribute($this->depthAttribute);

src/NestedSetsBehavior.php:1063

  • [nitpick] Add a brief comment clarifying that the tree attribute assignment is now intentionally omitted when no node is present, contrasting with the previous behavior that would assign a null value.
        if ($this->treeAttribute !== false && $this->node !== null) {

src/NestedSetsBehavior.php:1067

  • [nitpick] Ensure that the decision to not call shiftLeftRightAttribute when $value is null is intended; a comment clarifying this change from the previous default of 0 would improve code clarity.
        if ($value !== null) {

terabytesoftw and others added 2 commits June 29, 2025 13:47
…ht` shifting in `beforeInsertNode` method of `NestedSetsBehavior` class.
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
tests/NestedSetsBehaviorTest.php (1)

1624-1669: Good test coverage for null node handling, but fix coding style issue.

The test correctly validates that beforeInsertNode works properly when the internal node reference is null. The anonymous class approach for exposing protected methods is appropriate for testing internal behavior.

However, fix the coding style issue flagged by the pipeline:

-        $behavior = new class () extends NestedSetsBehavior {
+        $behavior = new class extends NestedSetsBehavior {
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7cf1407 and c3dd390.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/NestedSetsBehavior.php (1 hunks)
  • tests/NestedSetsBehaviorTest.php (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • src/NestedSetsBehavior.php
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (1)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: terabytesoftw
PR: yii2-extensions/nested-sets-behavior#13
File: src/NestedSetsBehavior.php:145-145
Timestamp: 2025-06-29T11:22:41.839Z
Learning: The user terabytesoftw prefers to keep PRs focused and small, implementing enhancements in separate dedicated PRs rather than bundling multiple changes together.
🪛 GitHub Actions: ecs
tests/NestedSetsBehaviorTest.php

[warning] 1625-1625: PhpCsFixer: NewWithParenthesesFixer suggests removing parentheses in 'new class ()' to 'new class'. Fixable by running with '--fix'.


[warning] 1672-1672: PhpCsFixer: NewWithParenthesesFixer suggests removing parentheses in 'new class ()' to 'new class'. Fixable by running with '--fix'.

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (20)
  • GitHub Check: easy-coding-standard / PHP 8.4-ubuntu-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpstan / PHP 8.4-ubuntu-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit-compatibility / PHP 8.4-windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit-compatibility / PHP 8.2-windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit / PHP 8.1-windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit-compatibility / PHP 8.2-ubuntu-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit-compatibility / PHP 8.4-ubuntu-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit / PHP 8.2-windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit / PHP 8.3-ubuntu-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit-compatibility / PHP 8.3-windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit-compatibility / PHP 8.1-ubuntu-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit-compatibility / PHP 8.1-windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit / PHP 8.4-windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit / PHP 8.3-windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit / PHP 8.4-ubuntu-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit-compatibility / PHP 8.2-windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit-compatibility / PHP 8.3-windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit / PHP 8.1-windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit / PHP 8.3-windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: composer-require-checker / PHP 8.4-ubuntu-latest
🔇 Additional comments (1)
tests/NestedSetsBehaviorTest.php (1)

1713-1763: Excellent integration test for tree structure validation.

This test provides valuable validation that the refactored beforeInsertNode method doesn't break normal tree operations. The test correctly:

  • Validates the initial root node state
  • Tests the appendTo operation
  • Verifies tree structure integrity after the operation
  • Uses proper error handling with try-catch

The assertions effectively check the nested set model constraints and depth calculations.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bug Something isn't working

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants