Skip to content

Conversation

terabytesoftw
Copy link
Member

@terabytesoftw terabytesoftw commented Jun 29, 2025

Q A
Is bugfix? ✔️
New feature?
Breaks BC?

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved reliability when appending a node by ensuring the target node is refreshed after a successful operation, keeping its state up to date.
  • Tests

    • Added a new test to verify correct left and right attribute values when a child node is appended to the root node.

…node after saving. Add test for `left` and `right` attribute adjustment when appending child to root.
@terabytesoftw terabytesoftw added the bug Something isn't working label Jun 29, 2025
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 29, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (e882fa3) to head (b64d4d3).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##                main       #24   +/-   ##
===========================================
  Coverage     100.00%   100.00%           
- Complexity        89        90    +1     
===========================================
  Files              2         2           
  Lines            466       469    +3     
===========================================
+ Hits             466       469    +3     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 29, 2025

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@terabytesoftw has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 22 minutes and 37 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between eb8cfad and b64d4d3.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • tests/NestedSetsBehaviorTest.php (1 hunks)

Walkthrough

The appendTo method in NestedSetsBehavior was updated to refresh the target node after a successful save operation. Additionally, a new test was introduced to verify that left and right boundary attributes are correctly assigned when a child node is appended to a root node.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
src/NestedSetsBehavior.php Modified appendTo to refresh the target node after a successful save before returning result.
tests/NestedSetsBehaviorTest.php Added a test to assert correct left/right attributes after appending a child to the root node.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Caller
    participant NestedSetsBehavior
    participant Node

    Caller->>NestedSetsBehavior: appendTo(node)
    NestedSetsBehavior->>NestedSetsBehavior: save()
    alt save successful
        NestedSetsBehavior->>Node: refresh()
    end
    NestedSetsBehavior-->>Caller: return result
Loading

Possibly related PRs

Poem

A root and child, in sets they nest,
Their boundaries now put to the test.
With a gentle save and a timely refresh,
Their numbers align, their states enmesh.
A hop, a check, the tests all pass—
Nested sets in harmony at last!
🥕

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@terabytesoftw terabytesoftw requested a review from Copilot June 29, 2025 20:14
Copilot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@terabytesoftw terabytesoftw requested a review from Copilot June 29, 2025 20:21
Copy link

@Copilot Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR refactors the save logic in the NestedSetsBehavior class so that the parent node is refreshed after a successful save and adds a new test to verify that left/right attributes are correctly adjusted when appending a child to a root.

  • Updated the save logic in NestedSetsBehavior to refresh the node after saving.
  • Introduced a new test in NestedSetsBehaviorTest to validate left/right attribute adjustments for appended child nodes.

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

File Description
src/NestedSetsBehavior.php Added logic to refresh the passed node after a successful save.
tests/NestedSetsBehaviorTest.php Added a new test to validate left/right attribute values post-append.
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)

src/NestedSetsBehavior.php:302

  • Consider adding a brief comment explaining why the passed node is refreshed after a successful save operation.
            $node->refresh();

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/NestedSetsBehavior.php (1)

299-305: LGTM! Proper implementation of target node refresh after save.

The implementation correctly stores the save result, guards the refresh call to only execute on successful saves, and preserves the original return value. The strict comparison === true is more explicit and safer than the previously suggested if ($result), though both are functionally equivalent for ActiveRecord::save().

Potential consistency consideration for future enhancement:

Other similar methods like insertAfter, insertBefore, and prependTo don't refresh their target nodes, which could lead to stale data in memory after these operations. Consider addressing this in a separate PR to maintain consistency across all node manipulation methods.

tests/NestedSetsBehaviorTest.php (1)

1755-1764: Remove redundant assertions.

These assertions checking that child.lft != 0 and child.rgt != 1 are redundant since the exact values are already asserted above (lines 1746-1754). The specific value assertions provide stronger validation.

Remove the redundant assertions:

-        self::assertNotEquals(
-            0,
-            $child->lft,
-            'Child node left value should not be \'0\' after \'appendTo\' operation.',
-        );
-        self::assertNotEquals(
-            1,
-            $child->rgt,
-            'Child node right value should not be \'1\' after \'appendTo\' operation.',
-        );
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e882fa3 and eb8cfad.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/NestedSetsBehavior.php (1 hunks)
  • tests/NestedSetsBehaviorTest.php (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (1)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: terabytesoftw
PR: yii2-extensions/nested-sets-behavior#13
File: src/NestedSetsBehavior.php:145-145
Timestamp: 2025-06-29T11:22:41.839Z
Learning: The user terabytesoftw prefers to keep PRs focused and small, implementing enhancements in separate dedicated PRs rather than bundling multiple changes together.
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
tests/NestedSetsBehaviorTest.php (3)
tests/TestCase.php (1)
  • createDatabase (93-127)
tests/support/model/Tree.php (1)
  • Tree (17-64)
src/NestedSetsBehavior.php (2)
  • makeRoot (837-842)
  • appendTo (294-306)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (15)
  • GitHub Check: phpunit / PHP 8.4-ubuntu-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit / PHP 8.2-windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit / PHP 8.2-ubuntu-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit / PHP 8.3-windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit / PHP 8.1-windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit / PHP 8.4-windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit-compatibility / PHP 8.3-windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit-compatibility / PHP 8.2-windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit-compatibility / PHP 8.1-windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit / PHP 8.4-windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit / PHP 8.3-windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit / PHP 8.2-windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit / PHP 8.1-windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit-compatibility / PHP 8.2-windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit-compatibility / PHP 8.1-windows-latest
🔇 Additional comments (1)
tests/NestedSetsBehaviorTest.php (1)

1723-1765: Well-structured test for nested set boundary validation.

The test effectively validates the core functionality of nested set left/right boundary adjustment when appending a child to a root node. The assertions correctly verify the expected nested set structure (root: 1-4, child: 2-3) and complement the appendTo method changes.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bug Something isn't working

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant