Closed
Description
Extracted from a TODO comment:
Lines 293 to 294 in bdfb314
Once #2885 is solved, it should be possible to implement deleteTree
without an allocator.
Currently, this function is recursive, which would require an allocator once we have #1006. However, I believe it can be implemented non-recursively, and that it would be a reasonable implementation. It would mean making a few more syscalls, but I think that's generally a nice tradeoff to avoid an entire failure mode.