-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 32
Feature: dynamic timeouts #228
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -433,6 +433,14 @@ def process_code_coverage(key, value, timestamp): | |
| self.logger.prn_inf("%s received"% (key)) | ||
| callbacks__exit_event_queue = True | ||
| break | ||
| elif key == '__timeout_set': | ||
| # Dynamic timeout set | ||
| timeout_duration = int(value) # New timeout | ||
| self.logger.prn_inf("setting timeout to: %d sec"% int(value)) | ||
| elif key == '__timeout_adjust': | ||
| # Dynamic timeout adjust | ||
| timeout_duration = timeout_duration + int(value) # adjust time | ||
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I was about to ask "what's the difference between |
||
| self.logger.prn_inf("adjusting timeout with %d sec (now %d)" % (int(value), timeout_duration)) | ||
| elif key in callbacks: | ||
| # Handle callback | ||
| callbacks[key](key, value, timestamp) | ||
|
|
||
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The beginning of the test (the "preamble" as its referred to at the top of this file) sets the timeout of the test with the
__timeoutkey. I'd say go ahead and reuse that key instead of making a new one, unless you have any objections.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The
__timeoutkey at "preamble" stage also sets the global timer to 0 and timeout duration. The behavior of__timer_setonly sets the timeout duration, but doesn't change the global timer (e.g. time elapsed). I'd prefer not to confuse these two different behaviors.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That's a very good point, thanks very much for clarifying 😄