Skip to content

Interactive performance comparison of 3D-printed electromechanical sensors, supporting the review paper "Advances in 3D Printed Electromechanical Sensors: Performance Comparison, Trends, and Future Directions."

Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings

AWolstrup/Awolstrup.github.io

Repository files navigation

Advances in 3D Printed Electromechanical Sensors: Interactive Plots and Data

This repository contains interactive plots and accompanying data from the paper:

"Advances in 3D Printed Electromechanical Sensors: Performance Comparison, Trends, and Future Directions"

by Anders Frem Wolstrup, Jon Spangenberg, Akio Yamamoto, Andrew Gleadall, and Gabriel Zsurzsan.

Abstract

3D printing has revolutionized electromechanical sensor design, enabling rapid prototyping and complex geometries, and driving significant growth in this research field. However, as more sensors are developed using diverse printing methods and sensing mechanisms, the need for standardized reporting and comparative metrics becomes increasingly critical. Without such metrics, new sensors cannot be properly contextualized or benchmarked against the state of the art, slowing progress in the field.

This review addresses this gap by cataloguing key performance metrics from the literature, including input/output range, sensitivity, mechanical and electrical properties, and the specific 3D printing processes used, to enable meaningful comparison. These metrics are applied to quantitatively analyze 74 sensors reported across different additive manufacturing techniques. Additionally, underreported characteristics such as hysteresis, drift, and long-term stability are considered to provide a more complete assessment of sensor performance.

Beyond quantitative comparison, this review introduces a framework for categorizing sensors based not only on electrical output type (e.g., resistive, capacitive) but also on the underlying sensing basis, distinguishing whether the response arises from intrinsic material properties (e.g., quantum tunneling, percolation) or from structure-induced mechanisms (e.g., constriction resistance).

The review also highlights advances in 3D printing for electronics manufacturing to inspire future directions and concludes with six recommendations for sensor development, focusing on aligning sensing mechanisms with appropriate fabrication strategies and aiding metric standardization across the field.

Repository Contents

  • CSV files: Contain the dataset extracted from literature, used for generating plots.
  • Python Notebook (InteractivePlot_test.ipynb): Contains Python code for generating interactive plots.

Interactive Plots

Explore the interactive version of the plots (Figure 7 and Figure 8 from the paper) at the following link:

🔗 Interactive Plots on GitHub Pages

Note

This repository and the interactive plots webpage are currently proof of concept implementations to demonstrate the potential for interactive data visualization of performance metrics for 3D printed electromechanical sensors.


For questions or further information, please contact the corresponding author or create an issue in this repository.

About

Interactive performance comparison of 3D-printed electromechanical sensors, supporting the review paper "Advances in 3D Printed Electromechanical Sensors: Performance Comparison, Trends, and Future Directions."

Resources

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

No packages published