-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 86
#795 Do not create a redundant data stream. #800
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request eliminates stream duplication in COBOL in-place processing by passing the original input stream directly to the stream processor instead of creating a copy. Additionally, explanatory comments are added to document multi-invocation behavior and redundant options logging in COBOL parameter handling. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes
Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✨ Finishing touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
🧰 Additional context used🧬 Code graph analysis (1)cobol-parser/src/main/scala/za/co/absa/cobrix/cobol/processor/impl/CobolProcessorInPlace.scala (1)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (5)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
Comment |
JaCoCo code coverage report - 'cobol-parser'
|
JaCoCo code coverage report - 'spark-cobol'
|
Summary by CodeRabbit
Refactor
Documentation