Handling Unknown Enum Values test #830
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @gcatanese, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request reactivates a previously skipped unit test, Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request enables a previously skipped unit test for handling unknown enum values, which is a good addition. The changes correctly update the test to assert the expected behavior. I have one suggestion to improve the consistency and maintainability of the test code by using getter methods instead of array access syntax, which aligns better with how other properties are accessed in the tests.
| self::assertEquals('AH3227C223222C5GXQXF658WB', $response->getId()); | ||
| self::assertEquals(AccountHolder::STATUS_ACTIVE, $response->getStatus()); | ||
| self::assertEquals("pending", $response['capabilities']['receiveFromPlatformPayments']['verificationStatus']); | ||
| self::assertEquals("this is unknown", $response['capabilities']['receiveFromPlatformPayments']['verificationStatus']); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
For consistency with how other properties of the $response object are accessed (e.g., $response->getId() and $response->getStatus()), it's better to use getter methods for accessing nested properties as well, instead of relying on array access syntax. This improves code clarity, maintainability, and leverages static analysis capabilities of IDEs.
Assuming the AccountHolderCapability object has a getVerificationStatus() method (which is standard for the generated models), this assertion can be rewritten.
self::assertEquals("this is unknown", $response->getCapabilities()['receiveFromPlatformPayments']->getVerificationStatus());
|
2 participants
The handling of unknown enum values has. been addressed by #807. This PR enabled the unit test that was still disabled.