-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 17.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Copter: allow vertical offset to be added to SafeRTL's return path #6796
Comments
As safe RTL is 3D, adding any offset would be inherently dangerous. The current method allows for the possibility that the vehicle may have traveled under a tree, bridge etc on the way out... |
Maybe the more general request here though is to do object avoidance during RTL (and other modes) which is actually already on the to-do list. I've updated the title in any case. Hmm.. reading it again, I guess general purpose object avoidance isn't what's being asked for so I've fixed the title again. |
Adding a offset to a safe path breaks the purpose of it. Can only envision this with the aid of SLAM and Object Avoidance. |
The intension bedding my request is high voltage line inspection. While a lateral deviation from the line may hit the trees (often higher than 66 and 132kV line) An RTL we use for safety, as is today, does not attempt to follow path, just adds a preset altitude, which is rather high climb, to ensure clearance over trees. An parameter for altitude offset, would ensure safe return when airspace above is safe, or below (when doing a bridge inspection. RTL could offset by a negative number, to get a bit lower) |
For some missions, close to obstacles, it would be great to have a SafeRTL paramteter to increase Altitude by "x" (tracking back home, adding some altitude to all recorded points.)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: