Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Copter: allow vertical offset to be added to SafeRTL's return path #6796

Open
AndKe opened this issue Aug 20, 2017 · 4 comments
Open

Copter: allow vertical offset to be added to SafeRTL's return path #6796

AndKe opened this issue Aug 20, 2017 · 4 comments

Comments

@AndKe
Copy link
Contributor

AndKe commented Aug 20, 2017

For some missions, close to obstacles, it would be great to have a SafeRTL paramteter to increase Altitude by "x" (tracking back home, adding some altitude to all recorded points.)

@proficnc
Copy link
Contributor

As safe RTL is 3D, adding any offset would be inherently dangerous. The current method allows for the possibility that the vehicle may have traveled under a tree, bridge etc on the way out...

@rmackay9 rmackay9 changed the title SafeRTL suggestion: Copter: add object avoidance to SafeRTL Aug 21, 2017
@rmackay9
Copy link
Contributor

rmackay9 commented Aug 21, 2017

Maybe the more general request here though is to do object avoidance during RTL (and other modes) which is actually already on the to-do list. I've updated the title in any case.

Hmm.. reading it again, I guess general purpose object avoidance isn't what's being asked for so I've fixed the title again.

@rmackay9 rmackay9 changed the title Copter: add object avoidance to SafeRTL Copter: allow vertical offset to be added to SafeRTL's return path Aug 21, 2017
@lvale
Copy link
Member

lvale commented Aug 21, 2017

Adding a offset to a safe path breaks the purpose of it. Can only envision this with the aid of SLAM and Object Avoidance.

@AndKe
Copy link
Contributor Author

AndKe commented Aug 22, 2017

The intension bedding my request is high voltage line inspection. While a lateral deviation from the line may hit the trees (often higher than 66 and 132kV line)
Holding altitude is no good, as we fly 20cm above the wires to photograph directly into chain links to assess water. Moving around the masts. Much too high risk to reproduce by replay.

An RTL we use for safety, as is today, does not attempt to follow path, just adds a preset altitude, which is rather high climb, to ensure clearance over trees.

An parameter for altitude offset, would ensure safe return when airspace above is safe, or below (when doing a bridge inspection. RTL could offset by a negative number, to get a bit lower)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants