-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.1k
adding support for firewall policy on vnet firewall #11003
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
c76e5cd
adding support for firewall policy on vnet firewall
saisujithreddym 86084c4
adding tests
saisujithreddym 31f62d3
cleanup
saisujithreddym 31fb3ee
test fix
saisujithreddym 05d4b3b
resolving merge conflicts
saisujithreddym ac104f4
clean up
saisujithreddym 436c4e1
removing the test
saisujithreddym 48c06d4
clean up
saisujithreddym File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This seems like something that should be enforced through parameter sets - FirewallPolicyId should not be in the same parameter sets that include ApplicationRUleCollection or NetworkRuleCollection
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am having trouble with the mutual exclusion scenario @markcowl placing firewall policy id in one parameter set and rule collections in another did not achieve the desired result.
I have tried various combinations but could not get it done. Do you have an example where we can achieve mutual exclusion using paramter sets? I will keep exploring as well
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We have decided to fail the call from NRP when there are both the policy and the rule collections. This way we need not make changes on the PS when we try to support policy+collections in case, show a message which is common across multiple platforms and track the usage. Also I would like to make a PR against network january branch and not the master. I have created another PR: #11013 am closing this one