Reference governance.yaml for the proxy — eat-our-own-cooking example?

[VamsiSudhakaran1]

Hi team!

litellm is the tool tens of thousands of teams use to put cost controls, rate limiting, and guardrails in front of their LLM calls — so you're closer to this problem than almost anyone.

I ran release-gate (an AI-deployment-readiness scorer) against this repo and it scored 60/100 (HOLD). It correctly detected the safeguards the proxy already supports:

✅ Budget / cost ceiling
✅ Kill switch / fallback
✅ Auth & rate limiting
✅ Eval evidence

Gaps flagged: a formal governance.yaml, a team-owner/on-call field, and a trace/tool policy.

Would you be open to a small PR adding a reference governance.yaml for the proxy deployment — a worked example your enterprise users could copy to document budgets/auth/fallback for their own gateway? Feels on-brand given the product, but I'll only open it if it's useful to you.