feat(abstract-utxo): refactor replay protection and signing for better testing #7650
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Replace internal call to isReplayProtectionUnspent with explicit param to allow better testing. Add replayProtectionAddresses parameter to signAndVerifyWalletTransaction with fallback to existing values. Issue: BTC-2806 Co-authored-by: llm-git <llm-git@ttll.de>
…n/fixedScript Move files to their appropriate locations: - Move replayProtection.ts to transaction/fixedScript/ - Move sign.ts to transaction/fixedScript/ - Update all import references throughout the codebase Issue: BTC-2806 Co-authored-by: llm-git <llm-git@ttll.de>
parvbitgo067
approved these changes
Nov 28, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR refactors replay protection functionality in the abstract-utxo
module to improve testability and organization:
to isReplayProtectionUnspent with an explicit parameter
with fallback to existing values
Issue: BTC-2806