Skip to content

Conversation

@amedora
Copy link
Contributor

@amedora amedora commented May 9, 2019

Description

Accoding to the KaTeX/KaTeX's changelog and related issues, they have fixed this problem in v0.10.0, but
I've updated it to latest v0.10.1.
katex2

Issue fixed

#2922

Type of changes

  • 🔘 Bug fix (Change that fixed an issue)
  • ⚪ Breaking change (Change that can cause existing functionality to change)
  • ⚪ Improvement (Change that improves the code. Maybe performance or development improvement)
  • ⚪ Feature (Change that adds new functionality)
  • ⚪ Documentation change (Change that modifies documentation. Maybe typo fixes)

Checklist:

  • 🔘 My code follows the project code style
  • ⚪ I have written test for my code and it has been tested
  • ⚪ All existing tests have been passed
  • 🔘 I have attached a screenshot/video to visualize my change if possible

@ZeroX-DG ZeroX-DG added the awaiting review ❇️ Pull request is awaiting a review. label May 10, 2019
@ZeroX-DG ZeroX-DG requested a review from Rokt33r May 10, 2019 23:19
@ZeroX-DG
Copy link
Member

I'm not familiar with KaText so I'll need review from @Rokt33r . This PR is somewhat duplicated with #2576.

@Rokt33r
Copy link
Member

Rokt33r commented May 29, 2019

I think I should merge #2576. If the author of the pr doesn't response in 3 days, let's try to merge this.

@Rokt33r Rokt33r merged commit f62eba9 into BoostIO:master Jun 3, 2019
@Rokt33r Rokt33r removed the awaiting review ❇️ Pull request is awaiting a review. label Jun 3, 2019
@Rokt33r Rokt33r added this to the v0.12.0 milestone Jun 3, 2019
@amedora amedora deleted the katex-2922 branch June 6, 2019 05:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants