Docs improvement #155
Docs improvement #155
Conversation
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughThe CONTRIBUTING.md file was expanded and reorganized into comprehensive contributor guidance, adding sections on code style, running tests locally, commit message guidelines, PR naming and descriptions, issue reporting, pull request process, and community standards. No code or API changes were made. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~5 minutes
Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
✅ Passed checks (1 passed)
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Warning Review ran into problems🔥 ProblemsGit: Failed to clone repository. Please run the Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
@coderabbitai review |
✅ Actions performedReview triggered.
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
CONTRIBUTING.md(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
CONTRIBUTING.md (1)
1-144: Excellent documentation expansion with clear structure and actionable guidance.The CONTRIBUTING.md has been thoughtfully reorganized and expanded with comprehensive, well-organized sections covering the contributor workflow end-to-end: code style, testing, commit conventions, PR expectations, issue reporting, and community standards. The tone is welcoming and inclusive, examples are concrete and helpful, and cross-references (e.g., CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md, Cargo commands) are appropriate. The document now provides much clearer guidance for contributors of all experience levels.
| [type]: short, descriptive summary | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| ### Examples: | ||
|
|
||
| ``` | ||
| feat: implement user profile editing | ||
| fix: resolve panic in config loader | ||
| docs: improve contributing guide formatting | ||
| ``` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Align PR title format between template and examples.
The PR title format template at line 96 shows square brackets ([type]: short...), but the examples at lines 102–105 use the format without brackets (feat:, fix:, docs:). Clarify which format is preferred, or update the template to match the examples for consistency.
Suggested alignment (remove brackets from template):
-```
-[type]: short, descriptive summary
-```
+```
+type: short, descriptive summary
+```📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| [type]: short, descriptive summary | |
| ``` | |
| ### Examples: | |
| ``` | |
| feat: implement user profile editing | |
| fix: resolve panic in config loader | |
| docs: improve contributing guide formatting | |
| ``` | |
| type: short, descriptive summary |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In CONTRIBUTING.md around lines 96 to 105, the PR title template uses square
brackets ("[type]: short, descriptive summary") while the examples use
unbracketed format ("feat:", "fix:", "docs:"), so update the template to match
the examples by removing the brackets and making it "type: short, descriptive
summary" (ensure the fenced code block markers remain intact) so the template
and examples are consistent.
2 participants
Description
This PR outline clear guidelines on the documentations in CONTRIBUTING.md
Type of Change
How Has This Been Tested?
This is documentation so testing was not required.
Checklist
Screenshots (if applicable)
Additional Context
Summary by CodeRabbit