Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Oct 23, 2023. It is now read-only.

Conversation

@blankdots
Copy link
Contributor

@blankdots blankdots commented Jun 8, 2020

Description

added definitions to schemas in order to reduce line numbers and simplify schemas

Related issues

Type of change

  • Non-Breaking change
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)

Changes Made

  1. added definitions to each schema if possible
  2. added github actions instead of travis (travis had issues so we switch to github actions)

Testing

  • Tests do not apply

@blankdots blankdots self-assigned this Jun 8, 2020
@blankdots blankdots requested a review from teemukataja June 8, 2020 18:22
@blankdots blankdots marked this pull request as ready for review June 8, 2020 18:25
@blankdots blankdots force-pushed the feature/update-schemas branch from bf696d3 to 37b5d81 Compare June 8, 2020 18:31
@blankdots blankdots force-pushed the feature/update-schemas branch 10 times, most recently from fa5dfd0 to 381db8f Compare June 8, 2020 22:29
@blankdots blankdots changed the title Update JSON schemas Update JSON schemas and use GIthub Actions Integration Jun 8, 2020
@blankdots blankdots changed the title Update JSON schemas and use GIthub Actions Integration Update JSON schemas and use Github Actions Integration Jun 8, 2020
@blankdots blankdots added enhancement New feature or request testing For when one needs more QA labels Jun 9, 2020
switch from travis as it creates issues.
@blankdots blankdots force-pushed the feature/update-schemas branch from 381db8f to 79866a2 Compare June 9, 2020 01:22
@blankdots blankdots merged commit b662ba8 into dev Jun 9, 2020
@blankdots blankdots deleted the feature/update-schemas branch June 9, 2020 07:29
@blankdots blankdots mentioned this pull request Jun 10, 2020
2 tasks
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

enhancement New feature or request testing For when one needs more QA

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants