Skip to content

Conversation

@loitly
Copy link
Contributor

@loitly loitly commented Aug 1, 2016

  • disable sorting when content is html
  • table options: auto-adjust all column width based on content
  • table refractoring..
    • renamed a few actions to better reflect what it's doing.
    • added TABLE_FILTER
    • document sequence of actions where applicable.
  • update build script to skip buildClient when possible.

 - disable sorting when content is html
 - table options: auto-adjust all column width based on content
 - table refractoring..
    - renamed a few actions to better reflect what it's doing.
    - added TABLE_FILTER
    - document sequence of actions where applicable.
 - update build script to skip buildClient when possible.
@tgoldina
Copy link
Contributor

tgoldina commented Aug 2, 2016

I think 5th issue (Catalog overlay should not use table id in drawing layer description. (See the attached screenshot.) It should be using MetaConst.CATALOG_OVERLAY_TYPE attribute value) was added after your last commit, and you did not have chance to fix it.

case TABLE_LOADED:
if (!getTableInGroup(tbl_id)) continue;
decimatedTables[tbl_id]= null;
displayedTableId = updateCoverage(tbl_id, viewerId, decimatedTables, options);
Copy link
Contributor

@tgoldina tgoldina Aug 2, 2016

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we update coverage image on invokedBy === TablesCntlr.TABLE_SORT? Probably not. Since all CoverageWatcher is doing is collecting points to calculate the parameters of the coverage image.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yep.. added logic to skip updateCoverage when table is reloaded due to sorting.

@loitly loitly merged commit dfc744d into dev Aug 3, 2016
@loitly loitly deleted the DM-7055_misc_table_issues branch August 3, 2016 01:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants