Updated so MER images plotted as cutouts #81
Conversation
… query, updated the author list
| df_g_irsa['y_pix']=xy_irsa[1] | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| Due to the large field of view of the MER mosaic, let's cut out a smaller section (30'x30')of the MER mosaic to inspect the image |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
why not use the astropy cutout?
bsipocz
left a comment
bsipocz
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think this can still use a lot of cleanup, but the notebook works and renders without an error, so I go ahead and merge it.
Some comments: the object we pull the spectra for has changed, and the new one looks kind of flat. Is that change intended? (the previous one, besides the obvious noisy spikes, looked to have some feature around 1.35 microns.
mpl understands astropy and its units, so I'll add that to the list of cleanups
| ### Now the data are read in, plot the spectrum | ||
|
|
||
| ## Now the data are read in, show an image | ||
| Divide by 10000 to convert from Angstrom to micron |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
OK, all of these should be dealt with astropy, but I leave that for a future PR.
|
|
||
| plt.plot(df_obj_irsa['WAVELENGTH'], df_obj_irsa['SIGNAL']) | ||
| ```{code-cell} ipython3 | ||
| plt.plot(df_obj_irsa['WAVELENGTH']/10000., df_obj_irsa['SIGNAL']) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This new spectra is kind of flat, while the previous one looked like having some signal around 1.35microns. Is that OK?
|
Thanks! |
Updated so MER images plotted as cutouts c51c38b
2 participants
updating notebook 4 to be a cutout of the MER image, updated the adql query, updated the author list