147 if item in section are removed remove the title of topic

[sauravpanda]

Pull Request Description

This pull request introduces changes to the provider.py and code_review.py files. In provider.py, it modifies the initialization of output_token_cost and refactors the assignment of input_token_cost and output_token_cost. In code_review.py, it refactors the create_pr_review_text method to include a check for high-ranked issues and updates the markdown output accordingly. The changes aim to improve the code review process and ensure critical issues are highlighted. The pull request also adds emojis to indicate the review status. Overall, the pull request enhances the code review functionality and provides clearer feedback to the reviewers.

✨ Generated with love by Kaizen ❤️

Original Description

None

[kaizen-bot]

Code Review

Code Quality

[important] -> Inconsistent formatting can make the code harder to read and maintain.

kaizen/llms/provider.py | 3 - 11

[moderate] -> Long lines can make the code harder to read and understand, especially when reviewing changes.

kaizen/llms/provider.py | 20 - 50

[important] -> Methods should have a single responsibility to improve maintainability and readability.

kaizen/reviewer/code_review.py | 145 - 27

Potential Issues

[moderate] -> It's important to handle edge cases to prevent unexpected behavior and improve robustness.

kaizen/reviewer/code_review.py | 27 - 31

Improvements

[important] -> Refactoring can help simplify the method and make it easier to understand and maintain.

kaizen/reviewer/code_review.py | 27 - 31

✨ Generated with love by Kaizen ❤️

[cloudcodeai-nightly]

Code Review

Code Quality

[important] -> Consider breaking long lines of code to improve readability and maintainability.

kaizen/llms/provider.py | 8 - 8

✨ Generated with love by Kaizen ❤️