Small adjustments #44
Conversation
WalkthroughThis update modifies the GitHub Actions workflow to skip the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant GitHub Actions
participant Pre-commit
participant Hooks
GitHub Actions->>Pre-commit: Run pre-commit with SKIP=no-commit-to-branch
Pre-commit->>Hooks: Execute all hooks except 'no-commit-to-branch'
Hooks-->>Pre-commit: Results
Pre-commit-->>GitHub Actions: Pre-commit results (skipping specified hook)
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes Possibly related PRs
Poem
Note ⚡️ Unit Test Generation is now available in beta!Learn more here, or try it out under "Finishing Touches" below. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #44 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 93.12% 93.12%
=======================================
Files 8 8
Lines 1076 1076
=======================================
Hits 1002 1002
Misses 74 74 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
.markdownlint.yaml (1)
4-5: Add a short in-file rationale for disabled rulesDisabling MD033 (HTML blocks) and MD041 (first-line heading) is fine, but future contributors won’t know why these were turned off. A one-line comment right above each key keeps the config self-documenting.
MD024: false +# Allow inline HTML required for shields / alignment +MD033: false +# README starts with a logo, so skip first-line-heading rule +MD041: false.github/workflows/verify.yml (1)
74-76: Preferenv:instead of inline assignment for clarityThe inline
SKIP=no-commit-to-branchworks, but moving it to the step’senv:block avoids escaping issues and communicates intent more clearly:- - name: Full pre-commit - run: | - . venv/bin/activate - SKIP=no-commit-to-branch pre-commit run --show-diff-on-failure --color=always --all-files + - name: Full pre-commit + env: + SKIP: no-commit-to-branch + run: | + . venv/bin/activate + pre-commit run --show-diff-on-failure --color=always --all-files
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
.github/workflows/verify.yml(1 hunks).markdownlint.yaml(1 hunks)README.md(2 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
- GitHub Check: Process test complexity
🔇 Additional comments (3)
README.md (3)
27-27: Good readability tweakThe extra blank line separates the heading from the body and plays nicely with most renderers.
120-121: Indentation fix keeps list rendering consistentAligning the back-ticked method with the others prevents it from being treated as a code block in some markdown engines. Looks good.
125-125: Blank line before a top-level heading is optionalMost markdown parsers handle this gracefully, but if you want to stay pedantic with MD022 (headings should be surrounded by blank lines), the added space is appropriate.
Summary by CodeRabbit