Skip to content

Conversation

@garrettwrong
Copy link
Collaborator

Close #1070 by adding incremental checkpoint and max iteration limits.

Altered proposed solution in issue slightly. Once I got in the code I noticed it is more effective to return and restore coef directly than convert to/from Volume.

Still considering options for testing this.

@garrettwrong garrettwrong added the enhancement New feature or request label Jan 8, 2024
@garrettwrong garrettwrong self-assigned this Jan 8, 2024
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 8, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (378b789) 88.76% compared to head (b69fe38) 88.80%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #1071      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    88.76%   88.80%   +0.03%     
===========================================
  Files          126      126              
  Lines        11969    12001      +32     
===========================================
+ Hits         10624    10657      +33     
+ Misses        1345     1344       -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@garrettwrong
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@j-c-c , since I added a bunch of doc string stuff probably best to start working through the review. Thanks

@j-c-c
Copy link
Collaborator

j-c-c commented Jan 26, 2024

@j-c-c , since I added a bunch of doc string stuff probably best to start working through the review. Thanks

Sounds good. I'll start taking a look today.

Copy link
Collaborator

@j-c-c j-c-c left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good. Just a couple things.

j-c-c
j-c-c previously approved these changes Jan 29, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

@j-c-c j-c-c left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good!

@garrettwrong garrettwrong marked this pull request as ready for review January 29, 2024 19:32
@garrettwrong garrettwrong requested a review from janden as a code owner January 29, 2024 19:32
Copy link
Collaborator

@janden janden left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great! Just a few things.

@garrettwrong garrettwrong merged commit 18fd19c into develop Feb 7, 2024
@garrettwrong garrettwrong deleted the inc_vol branch February 7, 2024 20:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancement New feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants